Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 22;117(8):1241–1245. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.282

Table 2. Circulating resistin levels and risk of MM, overall and stratified by selected characteristics.

  Quartile (Q)
   
  Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
   
  Ncases OR (95% CI) Ncases OR (95% CI) Ncases OR (95% CI) Ncases OR (95% CI) Ptrend Pinta
Crude 55 1.0 (ref) 48 0.87 (0.53–1.44) 33 0.61 (0.36–1.03) 42 0.75 (0.45–1.25) 0.20  
Adjusted for BMI 54 1.0 (ref) 48 0.87 (0.52–1.46) 32 0.60 (0.35–1.02) 41 0.76 (0.45–1.29) 0.24  
Adjusted for BMI and adiponectin 54 1.0 (ref) 48 0.86 (0.51–1.43) 32 0.59 (0.35–1.01) 41 0.76 (0.45–1.29) 0.24  
By sex                    
 Female 9 1.0 (ref) 11 1.27 (0.44–3.64) 12 1.56 (0.55–4.45) 17 1.82 (0.66–5.00) 0.23  
 Male 46 1.0 (ref) 37 0.77 (0.43–1.38) 21 0.44 (0.24–0.83) 25 0.54 (0.29–0.995) 0.03 0.12
By time to MM diagnosis                    
 <7 years 28 1.0 (ref) 20 0.63 (0.29–1.37) 14 0.41 (0.18–0.90) 23 0.61 (0.30–1.25) 0.21  
 ⩾7 years 27 1.0 (ref) 28 1.14 (0.58–2.26) 19 0.92 (0.45–1.87) 19 0.87 (0.41–1.86) 0.61 0.47
By BMI_categoryb                    
 <25 kg m−2 23 1.0 (ref) 12 0.59 (0.25–1.36) 13 0.68(0.29–1.57) 13 0.61 (0.27–1.40) 0.30  
 25–29.9 kg m−2 19 1.0 (ref) 26 0.98 (0.44–2.18) 17 0.60 (0.26–1.42) 16 0.62 (0.26–1.52) 0.20  
 ⩾30 kg m−2 12 1.0 (ref) 10 1.31 (0.43–3.95) 2 0.23 (0.04–1.21) 12 1.47 (0.46–4.64) 0.91 0.45
By age at blood draw                    
 <65 years 34 1.0 (ref) 31 0.86 (0.45–1.64) 17 0.55 (0.27–1.13) 18 0.61 (0.29–1.26) 0.12  
 ⩾65 years 21 1.0 (ref) 17 0.87 (0.38–1.97) 16 0.64 (0.29–1.41) 24 0.89 (0.42–1.91) 0.78 0.76

Abbreviations: BMI=body mass index; CI=confidence interval; MM=multiple myeloma; OR=odds ratio; Pint=Pinteraction; ref=reference.

Odds ratios and 95% CI were estimated using conditional logistic regression models, unless otherwise noted. Quartile cut-off points were defined on the basis of the distribution of cohort- and sex-adjusted resistin levels among controls, as follows: Q1⩽4.59 ng ml−1, Q2 4.60–5.82 ng ml−1, Q3 5.83–7.37 ng ml−1, and Q4⩾7.38 ng ml−1.

a

Tests of multiplicative interaction were based on the same models as those used for the stratified analyses and were performed using Wald tests.

b

Unconditional logistic regression adjusted for cohort, age, sex and fasting status.