Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct;8(5):816–824. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2017.07.10

Table 2. Propensity score matched patient characteristics.

Patient or tumor characteristic Adjuvant chemotherapy No adjuvant therapy P
n 46 92
Median age (range), years 59.2 (38.1–79.2) 62.9 (30.0–82.5) 0.146
Sex 0.640
   Male 37 77
   Female 9 15
Ethnicity 0.335
   Caucasian 42 89
   Other 4 3
Location 0.747
   Upper 1/3 0 1
   Middle 1/3 2 7
   Lower 1/3 25 53
   GE-junction 19 31
Histology 0.475
   Adenocarcinoma 42 81
   Squamous cell carcinoma 2 9
   Mixed 2 2
ypT-classification 0.749
   ypT0 6 8
   ypT1 4 16
   ypT2 14 23
   ypT3 21 41
   ypT4 1 4
ypN-classification 0.427
   ypN0 10 31
   ypN1 28 48
   ypN2 5 11
   ypN3 3 2
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy 1.000
   Platinum + 5-FU/capecitabine 41 83
   Platinum + taxane 5 9
Pathologic response 0.921
   Complete 3 7
   Partial* 24 51
   None 19 34
Margin status 1.000
   Negative 39 78
   Microscopic positive 7 14

*, partial was defined as a lower T-classification than seen on endoscopic ultrasound or node negativity with reported nodes positive on endoscopic ultrasound. No patient or tumor characteristics were found to be significantly associated with adjuvant chemotherapy based on case-control analysis with a 2:1 propensity score matching algorithm.