. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):287–296. doi: 10.1590/1980-57642016dn11-030011

Table 2. Diagnostic accuracy of MMC and CPM.

Sample		AUC	95% CI		Cut-off (z score)	Specificity	Sensitivity	ppv	npv
Sample		AUC	Lower	Upper	Cut-off (z score)	Specificity	Sensitivity	ppv	npv
a) Complete sample	MMC: Clinical vs Control	0.919	0.888	0.951	–1.10	0.82	0.87	0.94	0.65
	MMC: Hemiplegia vs Control	0.896	0.856	0.936	–0.91	0.81	0.84	0.95	0.52
	MMC: Quadriplegia vs Control	0.993	0.981	0.999	–3.79	0.95	0.99	0.99	0.90
b) Subsample	MMC: Hemiplegia vs Control	0.916	0.862	0.969	–0.87	0.81	0.89	0.86	0.85
b) Subsample	CPM: Hemiplegia vs Control	0.884	0.824	0.943	0.62	0.84	0.78	0.86	0.74

* ppv: positive predictive value; npv: negative predictive value.