Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 6;17:863. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4883-6

Table 2.

Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals of the mediating effect of lifestyle on the association between social capital and SRH

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Social capital
 Social trust
  Low 1.00 1.00 1.00
  High 1.263 (1.192–1.338)*** 1.204 (1.132–1.281)*** 1.195 (1.124–1.271)***
 Social relationship
  Not harmonious 1.00 1.00 1.00
  Harmonious 1.609 (1.506–1.719)*** 1.579 (1.471–1.695)*** 1.572 (1.464–1.688)***
 CCP membership
  No 1.00 1.00 1.00
  Yes 1.071 (0.998–1.185)* 1.130 (1.009–1.264)** 1.109 (0.990–1.242)*
Socio-demographic variables
 Gender
  Female 1.00 1.00
  Male 1.360 (1.286–1.438)*** 1.321 (1.227–1.422)***
 Age in years 0.963 (0.961–0.966)*** 0.963 (0.960–0.966)***
 Area of living
  Rural 1.00 1.00
  Urban 0.988 (0.900–1.085) 0.983 (0.895–1.079)
 Education in years 1.043 (1.034–1.052)*** 1.041 (1.032–1.050)***
 Marital status
  Never married 1.00 1.00
  Married/ cohabitation 0.622 (0.539–0.717)*** 0.656 (0.568–0.757)***
  WSD 0.710 (0.593–0.850)*** 0.749 (0.625–0.897)***
 Family size 1.035 (1.015–1.055)*** 1.034 (1.015–1.054)***
 Log of income per capita 1.066 (1.034–1.099)*** 1.067 (1.035–1.099)***
 Job status
  Other job types 1.00 1.00
  Agriculture worker 1.337 (1.186–1.506)*** 1.382 (1.227–1.557)***
  Private business 1.068 (0.970–1.177) 1.094 (0.993–1.205)*
  Waged job 1.229 (1.122–1.347)*** 1.258 (1.147–1.380)***
Lifestyle factors
 Healthy diet
  No 1.00
  Yes 1.034 (0.828–1.292)
 Physical activity
  No 1.00
  Yes 1.229 (1.149–1.316)***
 Smoking
  Yes 1.00
  No 1.062 (0.978–1.152)
 Sleeping
  Poor 1.00
  Good 1.159 (1.088–1.235)***
 Non-overweight
  No 1.00
  Yes 1.176 (1.098–1.260)***

***p < 0.001 **p < 0.05 * p < 0.1