Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 6;18:431. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1788-6

Table 4.

Descriptive results and between group effects

Six month follow-up Twelve month follow-up
Movement Coaching Control group p3 Movement Coaching Control group p3
base case 1 ( n  = 144) (n = 71) (n = 73) (n = 71) (n = 73)
 Workplace physical activity (MET-min/week) mean (SD)
median
[25%; 75%]-percentile
1851 (±3922)
660
[0; 2400]
1310 (±3077)
300
[0; 1440]
0.16 1142 (±1576)
375
[0; 1913]
931 (±1256)
405
[0; 1530]
0.65
 Leisure time physical activity
 (MET-min/week)
mean (SD)
median
[25%; 75%]-percentile
374 (±464)
270
[60; 474]
247 (±286)
180
[83; 310]
0.54 388 (±744)
190
[15; 360]
255 (±306)
180
[45; 360]
0.89
 Transportation physical activity
 (MET-min/week)
mean (SD)
median
[25%; 75%]-percentile
299 (±557)
120
[0; 315]
265 (±510)
120
[0; 360]
0.29 247 (±485)
88
[0; 338]
224 (±347)
90
[0; 240]
0.77
 Total physical activity (MET-min/week) mean (SD)
median
[25%; 75%]-percentile
2550 (±4037)
1515
[430; 3005]
1821 (±3158)
800
[250; 2415]
0.79 1679 (±1941)
960
[420; 2805]
1412 (±1301)
960
[390; 2370]
0.30
ITT LOCF 2 (n = 412) (n = 201) ( n = 201) (n = 211) (n = 211)
 Workplace physical activity (MET-min/week) mean (SD)
median
[25%; 75%]-percentile
3791 (±6321)
585
[0; 4455]
4282 (±7615)
360
[0; 3600]
0.58 3303 (±5925)
360
[0; 3510]
3904 (±7218)
450
[0; 3240]
0.94
 Leisure time physical activity
 (MET-min/week)
mean (SD)
median
[25%; 75%]-percentile
658 (±1799)
180
[0; 540]
514 (±1009)
120
[0; 480]
0.80 641 (±1824)
140
[0; 480]
480 (±918)
120
[0; 480]
0.97
 Transportation physical activity
 (MET-min/week)
mean (SD)
median
[25%; 75%]-percentile
467 (±1209)
0
[0; 420]
545 (±1439)
60
[0; 420]
0.45 445 (±1194)
0
[0; 420]
531 (±1432)
45
[0; 420]
0.49
 Total physical activity (MET-min/week) mean (SD)
median
[25%; 75%]-percentile
4867 (±7140)
1830
[350; 5760]
5480 (±8321)
1560
[260; 5940]
0.68 4535 (±6883)
1440
[330; 5155]
4962 (±7908)
1440
[385; 4320]
0.39

1patients that replied to the six and twelve months follow-up questionnaire; 2 ITTLOCF: if six months follow-up data were missing, it was assumed that the physical activity were the same as at baseline, if twelve and six months follow-up data were missing, it was assumed that the physical activity were the same as at baseline, if twelve months follow-up data were missing, it was assumed that the physical activity were the same as at six months follow-up; 3 Between group effects of the split-plot anova (LgMET-min/week: the physical activity data were logarithmized to the base of 10 due to skewed distribution), adjustment for multiple comparisons: Bonferroni; * significant at the significance level < 0.05