Table 4.
Six month follow-up | Twelve month follow-up | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Movement Coaching | Control group | p3 | Movement Coaching | Control group | p3 | ||
base case 1 ( n = 144) | (n = 71) | (n = 73) | (n = 71) | (n = 73) | |||
Workplace physical activity (MET-min/week) | mean (SD) median [25%; 75%]-percentile |
1851 (±3922) 660 [0; 2400] |
1310 (±3077) 300 [0; 1440] |
0.16 | 1142 (±1576) 375 [0; 1913] |
931 (±1256) 405 [0; 1530] |
0.65 |
Leisure time physical activity (MET-min/week) |
mean (SD) median [25%; 75%]-percentile |
374 (±464) 270 [60; 474] |
247 (±286) 180 [83; 310] |
0.54 | 388 (±744) 190 [15; 360] |
255 (±306) 180 [45; 360] |
0.89 |
Transportation physical activity (MET-min/week) |
mean (SD) median [25%; 75%]-percentile |
299 (±557) 120 [0; 315] |
265 (±510) 120 [0; 360] |
0.29 | 247 (±485) 88 [0; 338] |
224 (±347) 90 [0; 240] |
0.77 |
Total physical activity (MET-min/week) | mean (SD) median [25%; 75%]-percentile |
2550 (±4037) 1515 [430; 3005] |
1821 (±3158) 800 [250; 2415] |
0.79 | 1679 (±1941) 960 [420; 2805] |
1412 (±1301) 960 [390; 2370] |
0.30 |
ITT LOCF 2 (n = 412) | (n = 201) | ( n = 201) | (n = 211) | (n = 211) | |||
Workplace physical activity (MET-min/week) | mean (SD) median [25%; 75%]-percentile |
3791 (±6321) 585 [0; 4455] |
4282 (±7615) 360 [0; 3600] |
0.58 | 3303 (±5925) 360 [0; 3510] |
3904 (±7218) 450 [0; 3240] |
0.94 |
Leisure time physical activity (MET-min/week) |
mean (SD) median [25%; 75%]-percentile |
658 (±1799) 180 [0; 540] |
514 (±1009) 120 [0; 480] |
0.80 | 641 (±1824) 140 [0; 480] |
480 (±918) 120 [0; 480] |
0.97 |
Transportation physical activity (MET-min/week) |
mean (SD) median [25%; 75%]-percentile |
467 (±1209) 0 [0; 420] |
545 (±1439) 60 [0; 420] |
0.45 | 445 (±1194) 0 [0; 420] |
531 (±1432) 45 [0; 420] |
0.49 |
Total physical activity (MET-min/week) | mean (SD) median [25%; 75%]-percentile |
4867 (±7140) 1830 [350; 5760] |
5480 (±8321) 1560 [260; 5940] |
0.68 | 4535 (±6883) 1440 [330; 5155] |
4962 (±7908) 1440 [385; 4320] |
0.39 |
1patients that replied to the six and twelve months follow-up questionnaire; 2 ITTLOCF: if six months follow-up data were missing, it was assumed that the physical activity were the same as at baseline, if twelve and six months follow-up data were missing, it was assumed that the physical activity were the same as at baseline, if twelve months follow-up data were missing, it was assumed that the physical activity were the same as at six months follow-up; 3 Between group effects of the split-plot anova (LgMET-min/week: the physical activity data were logarithmized to the base of 10 due to skewed distribution), adjustment for multiple comparisons: Bonferroni; * significant at the significance level < 0.05