Table 2.
β (95% CI)a in BW/GA z-score per 1 unit factor score | OR (95% CI)b of LGA vs. SGA+AGA | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
BW/GA z-score | P | LGA n = 23 |
P | |
|
|
|||
Factor 1 | 0.06 (−0.12, 0.23) | 0.53 | 1.21 (0.71, 2.07) | 0.49 |
Factor 2 | 0.00 (−0.17, 0.17) | 0.98 | 0.87 (0.53, 1.42) | 0.57 |
Factor 3 | 0.11 (−0.06, 0.27) | 0.21 | 1.39 (0.86, 2.23) | 0.18 |
Factor 4 | 0.06 (−0.11, 0.23) | 0.46 | 0.96 (0.60, 1.54) | 0.87 |
Factor 5 | 0.28 (0.12, 0.43) | 0.0004 | 1.81 (1.09, 3.01) | 0.02 |
Factor 6 | −0.09 (−0.27, 0.09) | 0.33 | 0.93 (0.55, 1.57) | 0.79 |
BCAAc | 0.20 (0.03, 0.36) | 0.02 | 1.51 (0.92, 2.47) | 0.10 |
Estimates are from a linear regression model with the factor score as the exposure, BW/GA as the outcome, and maternal race/ethnicity, infant sex, and gestational age at delivery as covariates. Bolded estimates indicate statistical significance after accounting for multiple comparisons using Bonferroni’s correction (P < 0.05/6).
Estimates are from a logistic regression model with the factor score as the exposure, LGA (n = 34) vs. SGA (n = 2) + AGA (n = 101) as the outcome, and includes the same covariates as footnote (a).
A weighted metabolite pattern score based on a previously-characterized metabolite pattern implicated in excess adiposity and metabolic risk among Project Viva participants during mid-childhood (10).