Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 4;11(5):1588–1599. doi: 10.1177/1557988317714141

Table 2.

Survey Responses of Young Men’s (n = 282) Delivery Mode Preferences by Nutrition Components.

F2F (1-to-1) F2F (group) Video, e.g., skype (1-to-1) Video, e.g., skype (group) Website Mobile apps None#
Nutrition components
Cooking lessons 26% (n = 74) 46.8% (n = 132) 2.1% (n = 6) 4.3% (n = 12) 51.4% (n = 145) 33.3% (n = 94) 6.7% (n = 19)
Healthy eating on a budget 24.8% (n = 70) 32.3% (n = 91) 5.3% (n = 15) 3.5% (n = 10) 61.0% (n = 172) 46.1% (n = 130) 4.3% (n = 12)
Adding variety to diet 19.5% (n = 55) 31.6% (n = 89) 4.3% (n = 12) 5.3% (n = 15) 61.0% (n = 172) 44.3% (n = 125) 6.4% (n = 18)
Portion size 17.4% (n = 49) 31.2% (n = 88) 2.8% (n = 8) 5.0% (n = 14) 53.9% (n = 152) 35.8% (n = 101) 12.7% (n = 36)
Food labels 14.5% (n = 41) 30.9% (n = 87) 3.9% (n = 11) 4.6% (n = 13) 51.4% (n = 145) 37.2% (n = 105) 17.0% (n = 48)
Quick & easy meals 23.4% (n = 66) 35.5% (n = 115) 3.9% (n = 11) 5.3% (n = 15) 60.6% (n = 171) 46.5% (n = 131) 4.3% (n = 12)
Alcohol 14.5% (n = 41) 27.3% (n = 77) 3.2% (n = 9) 4.6% (n = 13) 46.5% (n = 131) 25.9% (n = 73) 30.5% (n = 86)
Average for 7 nutrition components * 20.1% (n = 57) 34.4% (n = 97) 3.6% (n = 10) 4.7% (n = 13) 55.1% (n = 155) 38.4% (n = 108) 11.7% (n = 33)

Note. *>100% as multiple responses could be selected; #no preference for delivery of particular health-eating component. F2F = face-to-face.