Table 3.

Logistic Regression Models Estimating Mental Health as a Function of Current Incarceration: Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study.

	Model 1		Model 2		Model 3		Model 4		Model 5		Model 6
	N = 3,139		N = 3,139		N = 3,139		N = 1,310		N = 3,139		N = 1,310
	OR	90% CI	OR	90% CI	OR	90% CI	OR	90% CI	OR	90% CI	OR	90% CI
Depression	3.04	[2.21, 4.19]	2.24	[1.54, 3.25]	2.11	[1.43, 3.11]	1.89	[1.27, 2.79]	1.97	[1.27, 3.04]	1.81	[1.18, 2.78]
Life dissatisfaction	6.34	[4.76, 8.46]	3.69	[2.65, 5.15]	3.67	[2.57, 5.24]	3.76	[2.59, 5.45]	3.67	[2.57, 5.24]	3.76	[2.59, 5.45]
Heavy drinking	0.58	[0.39, 0.87]	0.58	[0.38, 0.90]	0.61	[0.38, 0.99]	0.70	[0.43, 1.14]	0.56	[0.34, 0.93]	0.64	[0.38, 1.05]
Illicit drug use	2.85	[2.02, 4.03]	1.54	[1.04, 2.28]	1.70	[1.09, 2.63]	1.64	[1.05, 2.57]	1.53	[0.95, 2.48]	1.39	[0.86, 2.23]

Note. OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval. Each row represents a separate dependent variable. Model 1 is an unadjusted model. Model 2 adjusts for all covariates. Model 3 adjusts for all covariates and a lagged dependent variable. Model 4 adjusts for all covariates and a lagged dependent variable and restricts the analysis to individuals with a history of incarceration. Model 5 is the equivalent of Model 3 but substitutes jail, prison, or an unknown facility type in Years 1 or 3 for prior incarceration. Model 6 is the equivalent of Model 5 but restricts the sample to individuals with a history of incarceration.