Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 20;78(5):706–715. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.706

Table 2.

Differences in alcohol use and alcohol-related consequences by study condition and risk status

graphic file with name jsad.2017.78.706tbl2.jpg

Risk status
Outcomes Low riska M (SD) High riskb M (SD) Total samplec M (SD)
Weekly drinking quantity
 Control
  Baseline 0.68 (2.61) 7.09 (5.91) 2.33 (4.66)
  Follow-up 0.88 (1.82) 9.61 (9.43) 3.13 (6.26)
 Intervention
  Baseline 0.63 (1.60) 7.59 (4.88) 2.37 (4.11)
  Follow-up Peak drinking quantity 0.51 (1.42) 6.44 (4.47) 1.71 (3.35)
 Control
  Baseline 0.40 (1.01) 8.22 (3.89) 2.41 (4.04)
  Follow-up 0.73 (1.73) 7.56 (6.64) 2.49 (4.70)
 Intervention
  Baseline 0.69 (1.29) 8.52 (3.84) 2.65 (4.05)
  Follow-up Frequency of drinking to intoxication 0.83 (1.69) 4.88 (3.28) 1.69 (2.68)
 Control
  Baseline 0.28 (0.74) 1.78 (0.75) 0.67 (0.99)
 Follow-up 0.19 (0.44) 1.50 (1.29) 0.53 (0.94)
 Intervention
  Baseline 0.28 (0.54) 1.83 (0.85) 0.66 (0.92)
  Follow-up 0.24 (0.50) 1.18 (0.73) 0.44 (0.67)
 Alcohol-related consequences
 Control
  Baseline 0.88 (2.05) 4.67 (4.02) 1.86 (3.15)
  Follow-up 0.75 (2.31) 3.00 (4.33) 1.33 (3.09)
 Intervention
  Baseline 1.18 (3.14) 4.47 (5.01) 2.00 (3.94)
  Follow-up 0.76 (2.55) 3.25 (3.97) 1.27 (3.04)
a

Control group n = 78; intervention group n = 87;

b

control group n = 27; intervention group n = 29;

C

Control group n = 105; intervention group n = 116.