Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 23;8(50):87795–87808. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21202

Table 4. Previous FDG PET studies of animal heart in vivo for assessment of myocardial glucose utilization.

Reference Animal models FDG PET Time points Injection route Glucose clamp glucose uptake/MRGlu LV function
Yue et al., 2007 [27] db/db and db/+ mice Static W9 IV Insulin tolerance test ↓glucose uptake Preserved EF
Shoghi et al., 2008 [13] Type 2 diabetic ZDF rat Dynamic W14, W19 IV No ↓MRGlu, no difference in aging Preserved FS
Ménard et al., 2010 [28] Diet-induced Type 2 diabetic rat Dynamic W14 IV Yes ↓MRGlu ↓EF
Thorn et al., 2013 [29] Type 1 diabetic STZ mice Dynamic Baseline, 2wk after STZ IV No ↓MRGlu No mention
Nemanich et al., 2013 [30] Type 2 diabetic ZDF rat Dynamic W14 IV No ↓MRGlu No mention
Abdurrachim et al., 2017 [31] db/db and db/+ mice Static W10 IV No ↓glucose uptake Preserved EF

ZDF, Zucker Diabetic Fatty. STZ, streptozotocin. IV, intravenous. MRGlu, rate of myocardial glucose uptake. FS, fractional shortening. EF, ejection fraction.

↑and↓stand for increased and decreased effect, respectively.