Table 3.
Study | Scanner type | Voxel size (mm) | Matrix size (mm) | Echo time (ms) | Repetition time (ms) | Inversion time (ms) | Flip angle (°) | Number of slices |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Allan et al. | 3.0 T or 1.5 T Philips scanner | 1×1×1 | 3.74 | 8 | ||||
Boyen et al. | 3.0 T Phillips Intera MR scanner | 1×1×1 | 256×256 | 3.5 | 9 | 8 | 170 | |
Husain et al. | 3.0 T GE Excite | .935×.935×1.3 | 30 | 12 | 128 | |||
Krick et al. | 3.0 T Siemens Skyra | .9×.9×.9 | 3.74 | 8 | ||||
Landgrebe et al. | 1.5 T Siemens Sonata | 1×1×1 | 256×192 | 3.39 | 1900 | 1100 | 15 | 150 |
Leaver et al. (2011) | 3.0 T Siemens Trio | 1×1×1 | 256×256 | 2.94 | 2300 | 900 | 9 | 160 |
Leaver et al. (2012) | 3.0 T Siemens Trio | 1×1×1 | 256×256 | 3.5 | 2530 | 1100 | 7 | 176 |
Mahoney et al. | 1.5 T scanner type unknown | 256×256 | 5 | 12 | 650 | 124 | ||
Melcher et al. | 3.0 T Siemens Trim Trio | 3.45 | 2530 | 1100 | 7 | |||
Mühlau et al. | 1.5 T Siemens | 256×256 | 3.93 | 1520 | 800 | 15 | 160 | |
Schecklmann et al. (2012) | 1.5 T Siemens Sonata | 1×1×1 | 256×192 | 3.93 | 1900 | 1100 | 15 | 150 |
Schecklmann et al. (2013) | 1.5 T Siemens Sonata | 1×1×1 | 256×256 | 3.42 | 1880 | 1100 | 15 | 76 |
Vanneste et al. | 3.0 T Siemens Trio | 1×1×1 | 256×256 | 2.94 | 2300 | 900 | 9 | 160 |