Figure 2.

Rewarded antisaccade behavioral performance. ^*p < 0.05, ^**p < 0.01, ^***p < 0.0001. (A) Antisaccade correct response rate (accuracy) is significantly higher in reward trials compared to neutral [z = 9.01, ${\chi }_{(1)}^2$ = 81.16, p < 0.0001]. (B) Positive urgency is a significant negative predictor of AS accuracy [z = −4.19, ${\chi }_{(1)}^2$ = 17.53, p < 0.001]. This association is not moderated by reward [z = 0.32, ${\chi }_{(1)}^2$ = 0.12, p = 0.750]. (C) Those with externalizing risk have lower AS accuracy [z = −2.34, ${\chi }_{(1)}^2$ = 5.50, p = 0.019]. This does not differ by reward type [z = 0.66, ${\chi }_{(1)}^2$ = 0.43, p = 0.510]. Simple effects testing confirmed significant effects of externalizing risk and positive urgency in both reward and neutral trials (externalizing neutral: z = −2.43, p = 0.015; externalizing reward: z = −2.10, p = 0.036; positive urgency neutral: z = −4.06, p = 0.001; positive urgency reward: z = −3.73, p = 0.002).