Table 2.
Correlations among participant characteristics.
| EXT | INT | FH | ETD | PUG | NUG | Gender | Age | SES | GA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXT | Polychoric | Polychoric | Polychoric | Polyserial | Polyserial | Polychoric | Polyserial | Polyserial | Polyserial | |
| INT | 0.467** | Polychoric | Polychoric | Polyserial | Polyserial | Polychoric | Polyserial | Polyserial | Polyserial | |
| FH | 0.133 | 0.032 | Polychoric | Polyserial | Polyserial | Polychoric | Polyserial | Polyserial | Polyserial | |
| ETD | 0.056 | −0.085 | 0.223 | Polyserial | Polyserial | Polychoric | Polyserial | Polyserial | Polyserial | |
| PUG | 0.176 | 0.031 | 0.068 | 0.032 | Pearson | Polyserial | Pearson | Pearson | Pearson | |
| NUG | 0.231 | 0.135 | −0.103 | 0.075 | 0.686** | Polyserial | Pearson | Pearson | Pearson | |
| Gender | 0.091 | 0.238 | −0.241 | 0.091 | –0.282* | −0.095 | Polyserial | Polyserial | Polyserial | |
| Age | 0.086 | 0.194 | 0.080 | 0.705** | –0.244* | −0.095 | 0.136 | Pearson | Pearson | |
| SES | –0.432* | −0.060 | −0.210 | −0.010 | −0.162 | −0.109 | −0.014 | −0.005 | Pearson | |
| GA | –0.306* | 0.209 | 0.062 | 0.226 | –0.296* | –0.272* | 0.033 | 0.433* | 0.411* |
*
p < 0.05,
**
p < 0.01. Lower triangle displays correlations. Upper triangle displays correlation type. EXT, INT, FH, and ETD were coded with meeting criteria/risk as 1. Gender was coded with women as 1. See (Data Analysis for further discussion). Significant relationships are bolded.