Table 3.

For the PPS, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) results for four suggested factor solutions.

Suggested models	Chi squared (S_B)	dfs	RMSEA (S_B)	CFI (S_B)	SRMR
(1) One-factor (Steel)	3193.85 (2531.24)	54	0.118 (0.105)	0.888 (0.894)	0.049
(2) Two-factor (Rebetez)	1912.30 (1503.31)	43	0.102 (0.090)	0.926 (0.931)	0.042
(3) Two-factor (Rozental)	2328.45 (1841.95)	53	0.101 (0.090)	0.919 (0.923)	0.042
(4) Three-factor model	1131.00 (895.69)	51	0.071 (0.063)	0.961 (0.964)	0.032

Satorra–Bentler corrected estimates in parentheses. (1) One-factor model (Steel, 2010); (2) two-factor model (PPS items 1–8 “voluntary delay,” and items 9–11 “observed delay”), ignoring item 12 (Rebetez et al., 2014); (3) two-factor model (Items 4–8 starting late, lagging behind, and wasting time on other things, and items 1–3 and 9–12 focusing on delayed decision making, not meeting deadlines, and missing appointments) (Rozental et al., 2014); (4) three-factor model: PPS items 1–3, 4–8, 9–12 (Svartdal et al., 2016).