Table 2. Summary statistics of the diagnostic ability of HB-2 in four environments.
Environment | N | P value | Accuracy (%) | Positive predictive value (PF) | Negative predictive value (SF) | Sensitivity | Specificity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MI 2011 | 212 | < 2.2E-16 | 80.7 | 0.77 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.76 |
MI 2012 | 222 | 3.2E-07 | 64.0 | 0.45 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 0.56 |
OR 2011 | 217 | 0.0297 | 69.6 | 0.53 | 0.9 | 0.86 | 0.61 |
OR 2012 | 227 | 1.3E-14 | 70.5 | 0.47 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.6 |
Abbreviations: HB, haploblock; PF, perpetual flowering; MI, Michigan; OR, Oregon; SF, seasonal flowering.
The diagnostic test was interpreted as predicting SF if the diplotype is BBB|BBB. Diplotype association with flowering habit was assessed using Pearson’s chi-squared test of independence with Yates’s correction.