Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 12;2:80. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2017.09.06

Table 1. Overview of publications investigating the effects of immunosuppression on HCC recurrence after liver transplantation.

Reference Year Centre Evidence level (40) Patients (n) Immunosuppressive drug Recurrence rate (%) Results P
Vivarelli et al. (41) 2002 Policlinico Sant’Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna University, IT 4 82 CyA, STER, AZA (n=34);
CyA, STER (n=35);
TAC, STER (n=6);
TAC, STER, AZA (n=4);
CyA switch to TAC (n=3)
12.2 5-yr OS: 64%; 70% of recurrences within first year after LT;
CyA dose-dependent 5-yr DFS: 93% low dose vs. 76% high dose
0.01
Kneteman et al. (42) 2004 Walter C. Mackenzie Centre, Alberta University, Edmonton, CA 3b/4 40 SRL de novo CNI (n=40);
CNI tapered to 0 (3 to 6 mo)
12.5 MC in, n=19: 1- and 4-yr OS 94% and 87%;
MC out, n=21: 1- and 4-yr OS 91% and 83%;
MC in vs. MC out
0.68
Vivarelli et al. (43) 2005 Policlinico Sant’Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna University, IT 4 70 CyA, STER, AZA (n=44);
CyA, STER (n=26)
10.0 RR: 0% vs. RR: 33.3%;
DFS related to CyA exposure independent risk factor
<0.001
Decaens et al. (44) 2006 Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, FR 4 412 CyA based (n=284);
TAC based (n=128)
31.8 5-yr DFS and OS: 57.1% and 57.9%;
5-yr DFS CyA vs. TAC: 52.5% vs. 70.8%
0.003
Decaens et al. (44) 2006 Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, FR 4 412 ATG/OKT3 induction (n=55);
no induction (n=357)
31.8 5-yr DFS: 58.8% vs. 5-yr DFS: 45.4% 0.02
Zhou et al. (45) 2006 Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, CN 4 36 All switched to SRL: SRL, TAC (n=26);
SRL, TAC, STER (n=10)
27.4 Group A (early switch for advanced HCC, n=11): 1-yr OS 68%;
Group B (switch after HCC recurrence, n=18): 1-yr OS 67%;
Group C (switch for CNI nephrotoxicity, n=7): no recurrence
NA
Chen et al. (46) 2007 Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University, Wuhan, CN 3 44 STER withdrawal at 3 mo (n=28);
STER maintenance (n=26)
53.7 6-mo recurrence rate: 25.0% vs. 42.3%;
1-yr survival rate: 64.2% vs. 46.1%;
1-year tumour recurrence rate: 39.2% vs. 69.2%
>0.05;
>0.05;
<0.05
Toso et al. (47) 2007 Walter C. Mackenzie Centre, Alberta University, Edmonton, CA 3b/4 70 SRL, de novo CNI (n=70) 11.4 1- and 4-yr OS: 85% and 75%;
1- and 4-yr DFS (MC in): 85% and 73%;
1- and 4-yr DFS (MC out): 84% and 74%
0.9
Zimmerman et al. (48) 2007 UCH, Colorado University, Denver, US 3b 130 CNI based (n=81);
SRL based (n=49)
12.4 1-, 3-, and 5-yr DFS: 84%, 74%, and 67% >0.05
Vivarelli et al. (49) 2008 Policlinico Sant’Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna University, IT 3b 139 CyA based (n=79);
TAC based (n=60)
15.1 3-yr DFS CyA vs. Tac: 89% vs. 79%;
dosage-dependent DFS survival for TAC and CyA patients
0.047
Nocera et al. (50) 2008 Ospedale San Martino, Genoa University, IT 4 18 SRL de novo CNI (n=11);
CNI based, later SRL mono (n=7)
5.6 1 of 18 died within 12 mo because of pneumonitis;
1 of 18 experienced HCC recurrence at 14 mo post-LT
NA
Zimmerman et al. (51) 2008 UCH, Colorado University, Denver, US 3b 97 SRL based (n=45);
CNI based (n=52)
12.4 1- and 5-yr OS: SRL vs. CNI: 96% vs. 83% and 80% vs. 62%;
1- and 5-yr DFS: SRL vs. CNI: 93% vs. 75% and 79% vs. 54%
0.087;
0.03
Chinnakotla et al. (52) 2009 Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, US 3b 227 SRL based (n=121);
TAC based (n=106)
11.0 1-, 2-, and 5-yr probability for recurrence for SRL based: 5.2%, 9.2% and 11% vs. TAC 5-yr OS: SRL vs. Tac: 80% vs. 59% 0.0001;
0.0001
Vivarelli et al. (53) 2010 Policlinico Sant’Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna University, IT 3b 62 SRL containing (n=31);
TAC based (n=31)
25.8 3-yr DFS: SRL vs. Tac: 86% vs. 56% 0.04
Toso et al. (54) 2010 Walter C. Mackenzie Centre, Alberta University, Edmonton, CA 3b/4 2,491 SRL: (n=109);
no SRL: (n=2,382)
3- and 5-yr OS: on SRL vs. off SRL: 86% vs. 79% and 83% vs. 69% ≤0.05
Vivarelli et al. (55) 2010 Policlinico Sant’Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna University, IT 4 86 SRL based (n=86) 16.0 Only detection of risk factors for recurrence NA
Liang et al. (56) 2011 First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, CN 2 2,950 SRL: (n=332);
no SRL: (n=2,618)
1-yr OS OR 4.53, 95% CI =2.31–8.89;
3-yr OS OR 1.97, 95% CI =1.29–3.00;
5-yr OS OR 2.47, 95% CI =1.72–3.55;
recurrence OR 0.42, 95% CI =0.21–0.83, SRL vs. no SRL
<0.05
Rodríguez-Perálvarez et al. (57) 2013 Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, ES 4 219 High CNI exposure (n=48);
reduced CNI exposure (n=171)
17.6 1-yr DFS 90.6 vs. 95.7;
5-yr DFS 72.3 vs. 85.3
0.007
Xing et al. (58) 2013 First People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, CN 4 178 Basiliximab, TAC, MPA (n=78);
STER, TAC, MPA (n=100)
41.0 5-yr OS 42.5% vs. 50.5%;
5-yr DFS 38.9% vs. 39.2%
0.734;
0.913
Cholongitas et al. (59) 2014 Thessaloniki Hippokration General Hospital, Aristotle University, GR 4 43 EVL, CyA or MPA (n=21);
CyA (n=22)
9.3 Recurrence 0% vs. 18.5% after a mean of 49 mo >0.05
Geissler et al. (60) 2016 Multicentric, University Hospital, Regensburg, DE 2 525 Mix IS without SRL (n=264);
mix IS with SRL (n=261)
32.7 DFS 64.5% vs. 70.2% at 8 yrs (end-point);
OS 68.4% vs. 74.6% at 8 yrs (end-point);
DFS 72.3% vs. 80.6% at 3 yrs;
OS 70.3% vs. 79.4% at 5 yrs
0.28;
0.21;
<0.05;
<0.05
Yanik et al. (61) 2016 Multicentric, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, US 3,936 SRL (n=234);
no SRL (n=3,702)
6.1 All-cause mortality, HCC recurrence and cancer-specific mortality without differences;
among recipients ≤55 years old, worse outcomes for SRL: all-cause mortality HR =1.76, 95% CI =1.12–2.75;
recurrence HR =1.49, 95% CI =0.62–3.61;
cancer-specific mortality HR =1.54, 95% CI =0.71–3.32
>0.05;
<0.05

95% CI, 95% confidence interval; AZA, azathioprine; CNI, calcineurin inhibitor; CyA, cyclosporine A; DFS, disease-free survival; LT, liver transplantation; MC, Milan criteria; MPA, mycophenolic acid; OR, odds ratio; OS, overall survival; SRL, sirolimus; STER, steroid; TAC, tacrolimus, mo, month; yr, year.