Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 10;132(1 Suppl):53S–58S. doi: 10.1177/0033354917706968

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients visiting the ED for falls on high-fall and control days, after winter weather events, based on syndromic surveillance data, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2006-2011a

ED Visits, No. (%)b
Variables High-Fall Days (n = 15 d) Control Days (n = 243 d) OR (95% CI) aOR (95% CI)c
Total fall-related ED visits 3463 (100.0) 25 766 (100.0)
Sex
 Female 2004 (57.9) 15 295 (59.4) 1.0 [Reference] 1.0 [Reference]
 Male 1459 (42.1) 10 471 (40.6) 1.1 (1.0-1.1) 1.1 (1.0-1.2)
Age, yd
 <18 282 (8.1) 3811 (14.8) 1.0 [Reference] 1.0 [Reference]
 18-64 2450 (70.7) 14 022 (54.4) 2.4 (2.1-2.7) 2.2 (2.0-2.5)
 ≥65 730 (21.1) 7903 (30.7) 1.2 (1.0-1.5) 1.2 (1.0-1.5)
Time of visit
 8:00 pm–6:59 am 750 (21.7) 6347 (24.6) 1.0 [Reference] 1.0 [Reference]
 7:00 am–10:59 am 991 (28.6) 4805 (18.6) 1.7 (1.3-2.3) 1.7 (1.3-2.2)
 11:00 am–3:59 pm 1073 (31.0) 8736 (33.9) 1.0 (0.9-1.2) 1.1 (0.9-1.2)
 4:00 pm–7:59 pm 649 (18.7) 5878 (22.8) 0.9 (0.8-1.1) 1.0 (0.8-1.1)

Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratio; ED, emergency department; OR, odds ratio.

aUnpublished patient registration data from 21 hospital EDs throughout the Philadelphia area, collected as part of routine public health syndromic surveillance; limited to the months of December, January, February, and March. High-fall days were defined as days when the number of ED visits for falls exceeded the median number of ED visits for falls per day during the study period plus 3 SDs. Matched control days consisted of the same days of the week (eg, Monday, Tuesday) as the high-fall days from the same winter (16 to 17 control days per high-fall day).

bPercentages may not total to 100 because of rounding.

cAdjusted for sex, age, and time of visit.

dAge was missing for 1 ED visit on a high-fall day and for 30 ED visits on control days.