Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychol. 2017 Jul 31;53(10):1869–1880. doi: 10.1037/dev0000384

Table 1.

Statistically Significant Effects of SES from the Best-Fitting Multilevel Linear Models of PLT by Analysis Window

Effect Estimate SE t
TestWin-7 (1500–1750 ms after prompt)
 Intercept 1.22 0.21 5.95
 Higher-SES vs. Lower-SES −0.41 0.17 −2.38

TestWin-8 (1750–2000 ms after prompt)
 Intercept 0.98 0.13 7.52
 Higher-SES vs. Lower-SES −0.55 0.19 −2.87

The models presented are the best-fitting model for each time window; when effects or interactions do not appear, it is because adding them to the models did not reliably improve the fit. Formula in R – TestWin-7: DepVar ~ SES + Shape + (1 + Shape | Subject) + (1 | Rep Type); TestWin-8: DepVar ~ SES + (1 | Subject) + (1 | Rep Type). For the remaining 14 analysis windows, no models tested provided a better fit than an empty model with no fixed effects.