Table 3.
Mean temperature reductions and cooling distributions of the subjects who received ice chips or the cooling device
| Subject | Temperature reduction (°C) | Cooling distribution (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ice chips | Cooling device | Ice chips | Cooling device | |
| 1* | 8.50 | 8.90 | 51.48 | 46.76 |
| 2 | 10.80 | 10.80 | 54.81 | 55.81 |
| 3 | 4.90 | 9.60 | 48.41 | 52.49 |
| 4 | 11.00 | 11.10 | 45.69 | 50.96 |
| 5 | 6.10 | 8.90 | 52.23 | 49.14 |
| 6* | 7.90 | 6.30 | 48.06 | 43.33 |
| 7 | 6.40 | 6.60 | 53.58 | 39.44 |
| 8 | 10.80 | 9.00 | 50.29 | 43.45 |
| 9 | 9.10 | 6.90 | 43.66 | 50.59 |
| 10 | 10.60 | 9.20 | 46.63 | 50.59 |
| 11 | 10.70 | 8.80 | 45.28 | 49.01 |
| 12 | 8.10 | 5.90 | 45.76 | 49.30 |
| 13 | 9.40 | 9.50 | 46.13 | 48.00 |
| 14 | 3.10 | 8.70 | 47.35 | 45.45 |
| 15 | 10.30 | 8.90 | 49.28 | 49.68 |
| 16 | 9.20 | 9.40 | 43.58 | 52.05 |
| 17 | 7.00 | 7.60 | 48.23 | 41.36 |
| 18* | 8.00 | 1.60 | 41.48 | 39.39 |
| 19 | 5.20 | 1.60 | 59.25 | 42.36 |
| 20* | 4.40 | 8.80 | 47.69 | 47.41 |
| Mean | 8.08 | 7.91 | 48.44 | 47.33 |
The subjects marked in italics font started cooling with ice chips and the subjects marked in bold font started cooling with the cooling device. Subjects who tolerated ice chips better than the cooling device are marked with *