Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 12;114(44):E9346–E9355. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1707965114

Table S3.

Correlation between the expression of the enzymes generating OCDO and the histological grade and subtypes of patient tumors

Enzyme Histological grade HER2 and hormone receptor status
I II III P HER2 HER2+ P ER/PR ER+/PR ER+/PR+ P TN P
No Yes
11HSD2 n = 7 n = 17 n = 21 n = 36 n = 9 n = 11 n = 7 n = 27 n = 40 n = 5
 Low IRS (0–6) 4/34 16/34 14/34 0.0417 30/34 4/34 0.0275 8/34 4/34 22/34 ns 30/34 4/34 ns
n = 34, % (11.8) (47.1) (41.2) (88.2) (11.8) (23.5) (11.8) (64.7) (88.2) (11.8)
 High IRS (7–12) 3/11 1/11 7/11 6/11 5/11 3/11 3/11 5/11 10/11 1/11
n = 11, % (27.3) (9.1) (63.6) (54.5) (45.5) (27.3) (27.3) (45.5) (90.9) (9.1)
DHCR7 n = 7 n = 18 n = 20 n = 36 n = 9 n = 12 n = 7 n = 26 n = 39 n = 6
 Low IRS (0–6) 7/37 18/37 12/37 0.0021 35/37 2/37 <0.0001 7/37 5/37 25/37 0.0064 32/37 5/37 ns
n = 37, % (18.9) (48.6) (32.4) (94.6) (5.4) (18.9) (13.5) (67.6) (86.5) (13.5)
 High IRS (7–12) 0/8 0/8 8/8 1/8 7/8 5/8 2/8 1/8 7/8 1/8
n = 8, % (0) (0) (100) (12.5) (87.5) (62.5) (25) (12.5) (87.5) (12.5)
D8D7I n = 7 n = 19 n = 20 n = 36 n = 10 n = 12 n = 7 n = 27 n = 41 n = 5
 Low IRS (0–6) 7/38 17/38 14/38 ns 31 7 ns 6 7 25 0.0038 36 2 0.0307
n = 38, % (18.4) (44.7) (36.8) (81.6) (18.4) (15.8) (18.4) (65.8) (94.7) (5.3)
 High IRS([7–12) 0/8 2/8 6/8 5/8 3/8 6/8 0/8 2/8 5/8 3/8
n = 8, % (0) (25) (75) (62.5) (37.5) (75) (0) (25) (62.5) (37.5)

IHC analyses were scored as described in SI Experimental Procedures and Table S4. ER+ and PR+ tumors were defined by at least 10% of tumor cells being positive for these receptors by IHC analysis. HER2+ tumors were defined by at least 10% of tumor cells being positive for HER2 expression by IHC or a positive in situ hybridation assay. ns, not significant; TN, triple negative (ER, PR, and HER2). Correlations between tumor sample immunoreactive score (IRS) and pathological characteristics were analyzed using χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test.