Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2017 Oct 23;114(44):E9425–E9426. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1717049114

Correction for Huang et al., Cdk5-dependent phosphorylation of liprinα1 mediates neuronal activity-dependent synapse development

PMCID: PMC5676942  PMID: 29078422

NEUROSCIENCE Correction for “Cdk5-dependent phosphorylation of liprinα1 mediates neuronal activity-dependent synapse development,” by Huiqian Huang, Xiaochen Lin, Zhuoyi Liang, Teng Zhao, Shengwang Du, Michael M. T. Loy, Kwok-On Lai, Amy K. Y. Fu, and Nancy Y. Ip, which was first published July 31, 2017; 10.1073/pnas.1708240114 (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:E6992–E7001).

The authors note that Fig. 3 appeared incorrectly. The corrected figure and its legend appear below.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Reduction of liprinα1 phosphorylation enhances liprinα1–PSD-95 binding and promotes PSD-95 synaptic localization. (A and B) Coimmunoprecipitation of liprinα1 and PSD-95 in mouse brains at P10–P15. (A) Representative Western blot. (B) Quantification of PSD-95 bound to liprinα1. PSD-95 normalized to immunoprecipitated liprinα1, *P < 0.05 vs. P10, one-way ANOVA with the Student–Newman–Keuls test; n = 3 independent experiments. (C–F) Roscovitine (Ros) treatment increased liprinα1 localization density and percentage within the PSD-95 region. Neurons were treated with DMSO as control (Con) or Ros (25 µM) for 2 h and then stained with liprinα1 and PSD-95 after fixation. (C) Individual synapses showing the distribution of liprinα1 (green) surrounding PSD-95 (red) in the Con and Ros groups. (Scale bar: 200 nm.) (D) Representative images of the defined PSD-95 region (with yellow outline, area 1) and the surrounding region (red outline, area 2); both regions are indicated by dotted slashes. (Scale bar: 200 nm.) (E and F) Quantification of the localization points (NLPs) of liprinα1 per square micrometer of area 1, and the percentage of liprinα1 within area 1 vs. the total area (area 1 plus area 2). ***P < 0.001, Student’s t test; n = 53 and 51 synapses for Con and Ros, respectively. (G and H) Bicuculline (Bic) treatment (40 µM, 24 h) enriched liprinα1 and PSD-95 in the synaptosome, but did not affect their total levels. (G) Representative Western blot. (H) Quantification of protein level change of liprinα1 and PSD-95 in the synaptosome. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01, Student’s t test; n = 5 independent experiments. (I and J) Bic treatment or overexpression of liprinα1 TA mutant alone increased PSD-95 puncta density. (I) Representative images of PSD-95 puncta distributed along the dendrites of neurons overexpressing WT or TA liprinα1 with or without Bic treatment. (Scale bar: 10 μm.) (J) Quantification of PSD-95 puncta density. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 vs. WT Con, one-way ANOVA with the Student–Newman–Keuls test; n = 9, 12, 8, and 9 neurons for WT Con, WT Bic, TA Con, and TA Bic conditions, respectively. All data are mean ± SEM.


Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES