Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 24;17(10):2428. doi: 10.3390/s17102428

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Comparison of root mean square error (RMSE) values for (A) total nitrogen (TN) and (B) total carbon (TC) predictions obtained with (a) gradient boosted machines (GBM); (b) artificial neural networks (ANNs) and (c) random forests (RF) analyses in cross-validation (Cal), laboratory prediction (Lab) and on-line prediction (Online). Results were generated with local field datasets of 122 and 149 samples for the Hessleskew and Hagg fields, respectively, and a spiked European dataset (528 samples).