Table 1.

Overall energy saved by the proposed scheme compared to AHH-VBF.

Network Size	200	250	300	350	400	450
$T_r=500$ m	20.6	23.1	26.3	27.4	29.6	30.8
550 m	21.7	24.1	26.1	25.9	28.1	28.7
600 m	21.9	23.6	26.0	26.9	27.2	27.0
650 m	22.2	21.9	23.4	25.4	26.9	26.0
700 m	20.4	21.1	22.4	25.4	25.3	25.9
750 m	19.9	18.7	22.9	24.7	25.3	27.4
800 m	19.3	16.6	19.5	21.9	24.5	26.8
850 m	18.6	17.9	21.3	23.6	26.2	28.2
900 m	16.2	17.8	20.8	23.5	25.6	28.2
Energy Saved	20.1%	20.5%	23.2%	25.0%	26.5%	27.7%