Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 12;17(10):2315. doi: 10.3390/s17102315

Table 5.

Comparison of the classifier level fusion methods based on SVM (C = 101, C = 103) and k-NN (k = 1, k = 3) for mental workload estimation. 6 pairs of mental workload conditions (1-back VS 2-back, 1-back VS 3-back, 2-back VS 3-back, 1 and 2-back VS 3-back, 1-back VS 2 and 3-back, 1-back VS 2-back VS 3-back) are used to compare the ability of the methods to classify the mental workload levels in 1-, 2-, 3-back tasks. VGG-MKL is a multi-kernel learning algorithm based on SVM.

Conditions Methods k-NN (%) SVM (%)
k = 1 k = 3 C = 101 C = 103
1-back VS. 2-back Average 53.0 ± 13.2 54.0 ± 12.6 54.0 ± 25.7 56.1 ± 29.1
VGG-MKL 56.0 ± 17.4 55.3 ± 20.1
LCDM 75.5 ± 19.0 75.4 ± 19.5 79.2 ± 17.0 81.1 ± 18.4
IMIM-C 85.0 ± 7.7 87.7 ± 7.9 91.9 ± 11.6 97.1 ± 3.0
1-back VS. 3-back Average 62.1 ± 14.7 61.9 ± 15.7 47.8 ± 26.0 49.1 ± 23.6
VGG-MKL 45.8 ± 22.5 43.8 ± 21.4
LCDM 66.1 ± 18.1 66.3 ± 14.1 78.1 ± 18.5 78.5 ± 18.1
IMIM-C 89.8 ± 10.6 90.4 ± 9.8 96.4 ± 7.0 99.6 ± 0.9
2-back VS. 3-back Average 57.5 ± 12.2 59.1 ± 13.9 48.6 ± 14.3 48.3 ± 12.5
VGG-MKL 45.7 ± 28.3 44.2 ± 26.0
LCDM 64.1 ± 18.5 70.4 ± 18.9 67.4 ± 12.3 66.9 ± 12.2
IMIM-C 77.6 ± 9.8 79.2 ± 8.9 72.6 ± 39.1 86.6 ± 13.2
1-back VS. 2-back, 3-back Average 60.8 ± 5.0 60.6 ± 4.3 64.1 ± 19.0 65.6 ± 18.4
VGG-MKL 55.6 ± 21.1 53.9 ± 21.1
LCDM 71.2 ± 14.5 70.3 ± 13.5 78.6 ± 16.1 79.9 ± 18.7
IMIM-C 90.1 ± 5.4 90.9 ± 4.9 98.0 ± 3.8 98.8 ± 1.9
1-back, 2-back VS. 3-back Average 65.0 ± 10.9 65.2 ± 11.6 47.8 ± 24.0 49.2 ± 21.9
VGG-MKL 48.7 ± 14.5 48.1 ± 12.9
LCDM 64.6 ± 10.9 70.9 ± 18.0 70.6 ± 11.8 71.8 ± 9.8
IMIM-C 81.8 ± 9.6 83.1 ± 8.8 82.0 ± 36.3 91.1 ± 8.8
1-back VS. 2-back VS. 3-back Average 43.4 ± 3.1 43.6 ± 3.9 34.3 ± 23.8 35.4 ± 22.5
VGG-MKL 28.3 ± 18.6 26.3 ± 19.2
LCDM 53.0 ± 2.5 56.2 ± 2.7 61.0 ± 3.3 63.0 ± 3.5
IMIM-C 76.6 ± 10.8 78.5 ± 9.6 80.2 ± 25.4 89.9 ± 8.6