Table 3.

The top three generalized linear mixed‐effect models (GLMM) showing the effect of (a) flying fox flower interactions [FFI], nectar bat–flower interactions [NBI] and durian tree characteristic [DUR]; and (b) duration of flying fox flower interactions [FFD], duration of nectar bat–flower interactions [NBD] and durian tree characteristic [DUR], on mature durian fruit set at 60 d [F60]. Each of four durian trees (TRE) was coded as a random effect

Model	k	LL	AICc	dAICc	wAICc	$R_{\mathrm{m}}^2$
(a)
m1. F60 ~ FFI + NBI + DUR + (1|TRE)	5	−30	72	0.0	0.41	0.81
m2. F60 ~ NBI + DUR +  (1| TRE)	4	−32	73	1.3	0.21	0.87
m3. F60 ~ DUR + (1| TRE)	3	−34	75	2.6	0.11	0.36
(b)
m.1 F60 ~ NBD + DUR + (1| TRE)	4	−32	74	0.0	0.27	0.87
m.2 F60 ~ FFD + NBD + DUR + (1| TRE)	5	−31	74	0.1	0.25	0.80
m.3 F60 ~ DUR + (1| TRE)	3	−34	75	0.9	0.17	0.56

k, number of parameters; LL, maximum log‐likelihood; dAIC_c, difference in AIC_c for each model from the most parsimonious model; wAIC_c, AIC_c weight; $R_{\mathrm{m}}^2$, marginal R ² according to Nakagawa and Schielzeth (2013).