Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 21;7(21):8903–8914. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3337

Table 2.

Wolverine‐habitat model selections in the south‐central region of the Canadian Rocky Mountains. The best‐fit model for each model set is indicated by ΔAIC = 0.00 and AIC weight closest to 1.00. AIC values are calculated within each model set

Model set Model no. Variables Residual deviance Residual df AIC ΔAIC AIC weight −2LL
Null 0 149.46 90 286.23
Landcover 1 DENSECON + MIXED + + OPENCON + SHRUB + HERB + REGEN + SNOW.ICE 65.01 83 213.78 0.00 1.00 199.78
2 DENSECON + OPENCON 125.70 88 264.48 50.7 0.00 260.48
3 DENSECON 147.73 89 284.51 70.73 0.00 282.51
4 MIXED 126.12 89 262.90 49.12 0.00 260.90
5 SHRUB + HERB 144.46 88 283.23 69.45 0.00 279.23
6 SHRUB 151.90 89 288.67 74.89 0.00 286.67
7 REGEN 134.76 89 271.53 57.75 0.00 269.53
8 SNOW.ICE 105.03 89 241.80 28.02 0.00 239.80
Human Disturbance 9 BLOCKURB + LINROAD + LININD + LINRECQ + LINRECL 79.30 85 224.08 2.12 0.23 214.08
10 BLOCKURB 150.92 89 287.69 65.73 0.00 285.69
11 LINROAD + LININD + LINRECQ + LINRECL 82.86 86 225.63 3.67 0.11 217.63
12 LINROAD 145.53 89 282.31 60.35 0.00 280.31
13 LININD 85.18 89 221.96 0.00 0.66 219.96
14 LINRECQ + LINRECL 116.38 88 255.16 33.2 0.00 251.16
Climatic‐Abiotic 15 TRI + SP.SNOW 93.71 88 232.49 1.32 0.34 228.49
16 TRI 137.10 89 273.88 42.71 0.00 271.88
17 SP.SNOW 94.39 89 231.17 0.00 0.66 229.17
Biotic 18 WOLF + COUG + COYO + LYNX + BOBC + FOX + MART 104.56 83 253.33 7.02 0.03 239.33
19 WOLF + COUG 141.98 88 280.76 34.45 0.00 276.76
20 WOLF + COUG + COYO 110.21 87 250.98 4.67 0.08 244.98
21 LYNX + BOBC + COYO + FOX + MART 138.42 86 281.20 34.89 0.00 271.20
22 FOX + COYOTE 107.53 88 246.31 0.00 0.89 242.31
23 LYNX 150.58 89 287.35 41.04 0.00 285.35
Cumulative effects 24 DENSECON + MIXED + SHRUB + HERB + REGEN + SNOW.ICE + BLOCKURB + LININD + LINRECL + SP.SNOW + COYOTE + FOX 48.631 78 207.74 0.00 1.00 183.74

Models highlighted in bold represent the best‐fit out of each model set.

Cumulative model was included as its own set.