Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 9.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS. 2017 Apr;31(Suppl 1):S95–S102. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001337

Table 2.

HIV prevalence (HIV+ %) among women attending antenatal clinics located in periurban areas, by residential location of the women, years 2000–2012.

Residential location 2000 2002 2006 2012




HIV+ % (95% CI) N HIV+ % (95% CI) N HIV+ % (95% CI) N HIV+ % (95% CI) N
Urban 50.1 (44.9–55.4) 343 35.8 (31.0–40.9) 360 25.1 (21.5–29.1) 498 18.4 (15.6–21.6) 647
Periurban 48.7 (42.7–54.7) 265 32.5 (28.9–36.3) 615 25.2 (22.0–28.8) 618 15.9 (12.9–19.5) 477
Rural 52.8 (46.6–59.0) 246 34.2 (29.3–39.5) 333 14.3 (10.3–19.5) 224 19.5 (13.9–26.6) 149
Totala 50.1 (46.9–53.3) 916 33.8 (31.3–36.4) 1310 23.4 (21.2–25.7) 1344 17.7 (15.7–19.8) 1314

CI, confidence interval; N, number of women attending antenatal clinics. z-score test of HIV prevalence in local and nonlocal attendees, by survey year (P-value): 2000 (P=0.5), 2002 (P =0.3), 2006 (P =0.1), 2012 (P =0.2).

a

Total includes individuals with a missing value for residential location. Number of missing (n) by survey year: 2000 (n =62; HIV+ % =45.2, 95% CI: 33.2–57.7%), 2002 (n =2), 2006 (n =4), 2012 (n =41; HIV+ %=19.5, 95% CI: 10.0–34.7%).