Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 6;121(42):23520–23530. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b08176

Table 2. Formation Energies (ΔE) of π Complex (Ads-C4), Carbenium-Ion-like Transition State (TS-C4), and Surface tert-Butoxy Species (Alkoxy-C4) with Respect to Free Model and Gas-Phase Isobutene (all energies are in kJ/mol)a.

  Ads-C4
TS-C4
Alkxoy-C4
activation barriers
zeolite modelb ΔE ΔE(D) ΔE ΔE(D) ΔE ΔE(D) ΔEtotal ΔEtotal – ΔE(D)
FAU-47 –73 –40 –42 –50 –73 –60 30 40
FAU-7 –70 –43 –27 –52 –76 –63 43 52
FAU-2.4 –69 –44 –2 –55 –34 –64 67 78
FAU-Fe –68 –40 –24 –47 –87 –59 44 51
FAU-Ga –71 –41 –35 –49 –81 –62 36 44
FAU-SAPO –68 –42 –20 –52 –71 –61 49 59
FAU-Na –75 –42 –49 –52 –66 –66 27 37
MFI –97 –79 –62 –70 –86 –77 35 26
CHA –97 –70 –24 –98 –27 –101 72 101
a

The corresponding dispersion components of ΔE are indicated as ΔE(D). Activation barriers (ΔEtotal) and respective dispersion-uncorrected values (ΔEtotal – ΔE(D)) are listed separately.

b

As the estimated energy barriers in EFAl-containing models are even lower than 5 kJ/mol (Table S3), we ignore these models here to minimize the methodological error from DFT calculations.