Table 1.
Aim of study | Experimental design | Cell type | Syringe and needle | Flow rate(s) and other parameters | Brief description of results | Assays for assessment of cellular health | Refs. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Viability | Apoptosis | Senescence | Others | |||||||
Viability after cell transfusion: various needles and flow rates | In vitro | Bone marrow-derived mono-nuclear cells | Automatic injection pump and 16, 18, 22 G needles | 1 and 0.5 mm/s | No difference detected in viability ratios | √ | × | × | × | 95 |
Changes in hMSCs by transcatheter injection | In vitro | hMSCs | 1-mL syringe and 26 G (155 cm) Nitinol needle | 400 or 1600 µL/min | Viability not affected by varying rate. Slightly altered gene expression, but effects not translated into significant differences in protein production | √ | × | × | Clonogenicity, gene expression profile and cytokine secretion | 29 |
Response after manipulation in narrow-bore syringe system | In vitro | Murine MSCs | 10 μL syringes and 26, 25 or 22 G needles | Drawn up at 30 μL/min; ejected at 20, 5 and 1 μL/min; time within syringe | Needle bore size and time within the syringe affected viable cell density | √ | √ | × | Cell attachment and spreading | 94 |
Effect of delivery via needles and catheters at multiple flow rates | In vitro | Rat and human MSCs | 20, 25 and 30 G needles, and SL-10 microcatheter | 60, 120, 240 and 500 mL/h | No significant effect on viability (>70%). Delayed drop in viability at 24 h. No change in cell surface markers or function | √ | √ | × | Immunophenotyping and multilineage differentiation | 25 |
Small-bore size to deliver single/multiple cell injections | In vitro and in vivo (IV by tail vein injection) | hMSCs | 24, 25 and 26 G needles and 1 mL syringe. Multiple injections (10×): 26 G needle and 1 mL syringe | 2000 μL/min | 26 G needles can be safely used. Multiple injections were non-detrimental to cells (kept functional characteristics) | √ | × | √ | Morphology, immunophenotyping, trilineage differentiation, in vivo migration | 93 |
Impact of manual handling procedures | In vitro | Mouse ESC cell lines | 20 mL syringes: one containing cell suspension, luer-locked to stainless steel capillary (500 µm D, 1 cm L) | Pass cells between syringes at 0.80 mL/s. Centrifugation: 300×g, 600×g and 1000×g.Inoculation cell density | Gentle cell handling and minimal variations in environmental conditions needed to maintain viability. Inoculation density and time exposed to ambient conditions impacted phenotype. | √ | × | × | Phenotyping | 73 |
Impact of injection parameters in automated delivery for the brain | In vitro | Neural progenitor cells and bone marrow stromal cells | Automated injection device; 250 µL syringes with 20 G and 27 G needles, 3.8 or 15.2 cm in length | Flow rate of 1 µL or 10 µL/s; initial acceleration rate of 42 or 208 µL/s2.Delay between loading and injection | Longer, thinner cannulas and greater cell concentrations were harmful for delivery | √ | × | × | × | 50 |
Effect of DMSO, cell density and needle size on viability in 3D hydrogels | In vitro | NIH-3T3 cells | 27 G needle | — | Viability of cryopreserved cells was significantly lower than freshly collected cells. Needle significantly reduced cell survival rates. Higher DMSO concentration and cell density lowered survival | √ | × | × | × | 96 |
Effect of varying ejection rate, cell density and needle gauge on cell health | In vitro | NIH-3T3 cells | 30 and 34 G needles attached to 100 µL syringes | Drawn up at 300 µL/min, and ejected at 20–300 µL/min controlled using a syringe pump | Ejections at 150 μL/min resulted in highest percentage of dose delivered. Difference in proportions of apoptotic cells 48 h post-ejection was higher at slower rates | √ | √ | √ | Cytotoxicity | 60 |
Investigation of cell suspensions in large injection cannulas oriented at various angles | In vitro | Primary rat embryonic cell suspensions of neural tissue | 18, 21 and 25 G metal cannulas. Glass cannulaswith nominal ID of 0.8 mm. Cannulas attached via a short siliconetubing to a 100-µL Hamilton syringe | 10 µL/min using a syringe pump. Delay of 20 mins between loading and injection | Cell behaviour was affected by cannula diameter, orientation (horizontal/vertical) and material | × | × | × | Mean cell counts | 75 |
Effect of transcatheter injections on cell viability and cytokine release | In vitro | Mononuclear cells | Cell suspension was aspirated into a 5-mL syringe and then infused through a 25 G needle. Cells were passed through an Excelsior SL-10 catheter; Iodine and heparin exposure | 0.5–5 mL/min | Flow rates from 0.5–2 mL/min did not alter viability, but 5 mL/min reduced viability by 19%. Catheter delivery at 2 mL/min did not affect VEGF, IL-10 or IGF-1 levels. Iodine and low-dose heparin did not affect viability, but high-dose heparin caused cell death | √ | √ | × | Cellular function was assessed by production and release of VEGF, IL-10 and IGF-1 | 118 |
Effect of ejection rate and needle gauge on cell health | In vitro | hMSCs | 30 and 34 G needles attached to 100 µL syringes | Drawn up at 300 µL/min, and ejected at 10–300 µL/min using a syringe pump | 300 μL/min resulted in highest viable cell recovery. Apoptosis levels at 10 µL/min were significantly higher than control. Downregulation of CD105 expression at 10 µL/min | √ | √ | √ | Immunophenotyping, trilineage differentiation | 74 |
CBF cerebral blood flow, G gauge, IV intravenous.