Table 2.
Comparison of students’ perspectives between flipped classroom and traditional lecture-based classroom in ocular trauma clerkship.
| Items | Group | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Statistics | P valuea | Effect sizeb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The course improves my learning motivation. | FG | 0 (0%) | 12 (29.2%) | 29 (70.8%) | U = 511.5 | 0.012* | 0.60 |
| TG | 1 (2.8%) | 19 (54.3%) | 15 (42.9%) | ||||
| The course is helpful for understanding the course material. | FG | 0 (0%) | 22 (48.8%) | 21 (51.2%) | U = 536.5 | 0.029* | 0.51 |
| TG | 3 (8.6%) | 23 (65.7%) | 9 (25.7%) | ||||
| The course is helpful for the final examination. | FG | 1 (2.4%) | 20 (48.8%) | 20 (48.8%) | U = 443 | 0.001** | 0.70 |
| TG | 4 (11.4%) | 26 (74.3%) | 5 (14.3%) | ||||
| I am satisfied with the course. | FG | 0 (0%) | 18 (43.9%) | 23 (56.1%) | U = 675 | 0.610 | 0.10 |
| TG | 1 (2.9%) | 16 (45.7%) | 18 (51.4%) | ||||
| I like this teaching method. | FG | 0 (0%) | 18 (43.9%) | 23 (56.1%) | U = 622.5 | 0.253 | 0.23 |
| TG | 0 (0%) | 20 (57.1%) | 15 (42.9%) | ||||
| I would like this teaching method to be applied in the future ophthalmology curriculum. | FG | 2 (4.9%) | 21 (51.2%) | 18 (43.9%) | U = 638.5 | 0.351 | 0.19 |
| TG | 1 (2.9%) | 15 (42.8%) | 19 (54.3%) | ||||
| This course gives me too much burden and pressure | FG | 8 (19.5%) | 23 (56.1%) | 10 (24.4%) | U = 483.0 | 0.007** | 0.58 |
| TG | 15 (42.9%) | 18 (51.4%) | 2 (5.7%) | ||||
| This course occupies too much of my spare time. | FG | 9 (22.0%) | 24 (58.5%) | 8 (19.5%) | U = 601.5 | 0.169 | 0.28 |
| TG | 11 (31.4%) | 21 (60.0%) | 3 (8.6%) | ||||
| I need to spend a lot of energy on this course. | FG | 16 (39.9%) | 25 (60.1%) | 0 (0%) | U = 669.5 | 0.559 | 0.12 |
| TG | 16 (45.7%) | 19 (54.3%) | 0 (14.3%) |