Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 7;14:154. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0608-6

Table 2.

Ranking of top 15 dietary factors (presented in table are mean (SD))

Ranka Factor Modifiability Priority for research Effect on Behaviour SUM Cluster name
1 Food availability 3.37 (1.18) 3.50 (1.00) 3.93 (1.10) 10.80 Accessibility of food
2 Food policy 3.27 (0.96) 3.95 (0.94) 3.57 (1.19) 10.78 Accessibility of food
3 Perceived barriers 3.82 (0.75) 3.43 (1.27) 3.52 (0.99) 10.77 Psychosocial
4 Nutrition knowledge 4.23 (0.73) 3.20 (1.20) 3.22 (0.89) 10.65 Resources/social capital
5 Food prices 2.68 (1.33) 3.72 (1.17) 4.20 (0.77) 10.60 Accessibility of food
6 Children’s food preferences 3.43 (0.75) 3.35 (0.93) 3.72 (0.91) 10.50 Food beliefs & perceptions
7 Food-related life-style 2.95 (1.00) 3.70 (0.98) 3.77 (1.11) 10.42 Accessibility of food
8 Social role of food 2.23 (0.88) 3.85 (0.81) 3.98 (0.80) 10.07 Food beliefs & perceptions
9 Psycho-social stress 2.95 (1.00) 3.65 (1.09) 3.45 (0.94) 10.05 Psychosocial
10 Food beliefs 2.93 (0.81) 3.42 (0.82) 3.68 (0.92) 10.03 Food beliefs & perceptions
11 Social networks 2.55 (0.83) 3.62 (0.59) 3.68 (0.73) 9.85 Social and cultural
12 Subjective norms 2.87 (1.05) 3.33 (0.87) 3.52 (0.94) 9.72 Psychosocial
13 Accessibility of traditional foods 3.32 (1.08) 3.08 (1.06) 3.05 (1.19) 9.45 Accessibility of food
14 Immigrant related policy 3.05 (1.05) 3.52 (1.14) 2.85 (1.18) 9.42 Migration context
15 Level of acculturation 2.62 (1.20) 3.32 (0.98) 3.28 (0.91) 9.22 Social and cultural

All scores on a scale of 1–5, with 5 as most modifiable, strongest effect, largest priority

aPosition that the factors were ranked in from the 79 diet factors based on 3 criteria of ‘research priority’, ‘expected modifiability’ and ‘potential effect size on behaviour’; factors were scored by 20 people for all 3 criteria