Table 2.
Ranka | Factor | Modifiability | Priority for research | Effect on Behaviour | SUM | Cluster name |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Food availability | 3.37 (1.18) | 3.50 (1.00) | 3.93 (1.10) | 10.80 | Accessibility of food |
2 | Food policy | 3.27 (0.96) | 3.95 (0.94) | 3.57 (1.19) | 10.78 | Accessibility of food |
3 | Perceived barriers | 3.82 (0.75) | 3.43 (1.27) | 3.52 (0.99) | 10.77 | Psychosocial |
4 | Nutrition knowledge | 4.23 (0.73) | 3.20 (1.20) | 3.22 (0.89) | 10.65 | Resources/social capital |
5 | Food prices | 2.68 (1.33) | 3.72 (1.17) | 4.20 (0.77) | 10.60 | Accessibility of food |
6 | Children’s food preferences | 3.43 (0.75) | 3.35 (0.93) | 3.72 (0.91) | 10.50 | Food beliefs & perceptions |
7 | Food-related life-style | 2.95 (1.00) | 3.70 (0.98) | 3.77 (1.11) | 10.42 | Accessibility of food |
8 | Social role of food | 2.23 (0.88) | 3.85 (0.81) | 3.98 (0.80) | 10.07 | Food beliefs & perceptions |
9 | Psycho-social stress | 2.95 (1.00) | 3.65 (1.09) | 3.45 (0.94) | 10.05 | Psychosocial |
10 | Food beliefs | 2.93 (0.81) | 3.42 (0.82) | 3.68 (0.92) | 10.03 | Food beliefs & perceptions |
11 | Social networks | 2.55 (0.83) | 3.62 (0.59) | 3.68 (0.73) | 9.85 | Social and cultural |
12 | Subjective norms | 2.87 (1.05) | 3.33 (0.87) | 3.52 (0.94) | 9.72 | Psychosocial |
13 | Accessibility of traditional foods | 3.32 (1.08) | 3.08 (1.06) | 3.05 (1.19) | 9.45 | Accessibility of food |
14 | Immigrant related policy | 3.05 (1.05) | 3.52 (1.14) | 2.85 (1.18) | 9.42 | Migration context |
15 | Level of acculturation | 2.62 (1.20) | 3.32 (0.98) | 3.28 (0.91) | 9.22 | Social and cultural |
All scores on a scale of 1–5, with 5 as most modifiable, strongest effect, largest priority
aPosition that the factors were ranked in from the 79 diet factors based on 3 criteria of ‘research priority’, ‘expected modifiability’ and ‘potential effect size on behaviour’; factors were scored by 20 people for all 3 criteria