Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 7;14:154. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0608-6

Table 4.

Ranking of clusters for dietary and physical activity behaviour factors

Cluster Number of factorsa Mean Modifiability max score 5 Mean Priority for research
max score 5
Mean effect on behaviour
max score 5
SUM of raw scores Mean score/factorb max score 15 Cluster rankc
Dietary behaviour
 Psychosocial 12 3.07 3.10 3.69 108.43 9.04 1
 Food beliefs and perceptions 11 2.73 2.88 3.34 98.50 8.96 2
 Social and material resources 10 2.36 3.04 3.51 89.03 8.90 3
 Accessibility of food 12 2.46 3.02 3.31 105.57 8.80 4
 The body 5 2.87 2.54 3.14 42.75 8.55 5
 Social and cultural environment 18 1.99 2.84 3.19 144.27 8.02 6
 Migration context 13 1.47 2.51 3.08 91.70 7.05 7
Physical activity behaviours
 Psychosocial 38 2.70 2.64 3.17 323.62 8.52 1
 Institutional environment 14 2.68 2.29 3.00 114.73 8.20 2
 Political environment 3 2.14 2.95 3.05 24.44 8.15 3
 Social and cultural environment 49 2.13 2.64 3.12 394.32 8.05 4
 Physical environment and opportunity 31 2.45 2.47 3.08 247.81 7.99 5
 Social and material resources 12 1.83 2.66 3.41 94.71 7.89 6
 Health and health communication 12 2.29 2.35 3.22 94.34 7.86 7
 Migration context 17 1.76 2.31 2.70 121.90 7.17 8

aThe number of factors here does not include those 6 factors identified at the ISBNPA symposium, as they were not scored. The full list is in Tables 1 and 3

bMean is the total sum divided by the number of factors- so a maximum of 15 could be gained as 3 criteria on a Likert scale of 1–5, with 5 as most modifiable, strongest effect, largest priority

cPosition that the factors were ranked in based on overall SUM/number of factors in each cluster