Table 3. Baseline characteristics of the 72 PPGL patients according to the occurrence of metastasis by PHEO or PGL.
Variable | Non-metastatic PHEO (N = 50, 79.4%) | Metastatic PHEO (N = 13, 20.6%) | P | Non-metastatic PGL (N = 7, 77.8%) | Metastatic PGL (N = 2, 22.2%) | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age (years), mean±SD | 48.8 ± 13.3 | 40.6 ± 17.8 | 0.072 | 40.6 ± 21.3 | 32.0 ± 2.8 | 0.606 |
Female, N (%) | 44 (88.0%) | 8 (61.5%) | 0.067 | 3 (42.9%) | 2 (100.0%) | 0.530 |
Height (cm), mean±SD | 157.0 ± 6.9 | 162.2 ± 7.2 | 0.020 | 165.9 ± 8.7 | 163.8 ± 0.4 | 0.746 |
Weight (kg), mean±SD | 58.1 ±8.2 | 61.2 ± 9.2 | 0.251 | 68.0 ± 14.9 | 58.7 ± 1.8 | 0.428 |
BMI (kg/m2), mean±SD | 23.6 ±3.4 | 23.3 ± 3.3 | 0.714 | 24.4 ± 3.7 | 21.9 ± 0.6 | 0.394 |
Size of tumor (cm), mean±SD | 6.7 ± 3.4 | 8.5 ± 4.2 | 0.112 | 6.1 ± 2.6 | 9.0 ± 4.9 | 0.282 |
Familial form, N (%) | 4 (8.0%) | 2 (15.4%) | 0.781 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | >0.999 |
Functioning type, N (%) | 41 (82.0%) | 13 (100.0%) | 0.227 | 6 (85.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0.537 |
Adrenergic type, N (%) | 30 (73.2%) | 6 (46.2%) | 0.143 | 3 (50.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | >0.999 |
Noradrenergic type, N (%) | 11 (26.8%) | 7 (53.8%) | 3 (50.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
UMN (μg/day), median [IQR] | 1099.2 [161.0; 3518.0] | 1373.3 [442.3; 4333.0] | 0.644 | 81.7 [78.9; 91.5] | 14.8 [NA] | 0.740 |
UNM (μg/day), median [IQR] | 3481.5 [1682.6; 7521.4] | 4000.3 [1926.5; 5281.1] | 0.878 | 6045.7 [3510.0; 9873.2] | 848.0 [NA] | 0.229 |
Loss of SDHB staining on IHC, N (%) | 4 (8.0%) | 4 (30.8%) | 0.084 | 2 (28.6%) | 1 (50.0%) | 0.200 |
Duration of follow-up (months), mean±SD | 46.9 ± 37.7 | 32.6 ± 30.2 | 0.211 | 54.1 ± 48.2 | 26.5 ± 36.1 | 0.484 |
BMI, body mass index; IQR, interquartile ranges; IHC, immunohistochemistry; PHEO, pheochromocytoma; PGL, paraganglioma; PPGL, pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma; NA, not applicable; SD, standard deviation; SDHB, succinate dehydrogenase gene subunit B; UMN, urine fractionated metanephrine; UNM, urine fractionated normetanephrine.
If the UMN levels were high, with or without elevated UNM levels, the catecholamine type was adrenergic type. If the UNM levels were high, without elevated UMN levels, the catecholamine type was noradrenergic type.
Significant results (P<0.05) are in bold.