Table 1.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.Mothers’ Age | – | .07 | .13 | −.05 | −.34*** | −.09 | −.15+ | −.07 | .19* | −.16* |
2.Mothers’ Nativity | .15+ | – | −.21** | −.35*** | −.01 | −.04 | .06 | .01 | −.02 | −.04 |
3.Children’s Skin Tone | .26*** | −.03 | – | .12 | −.05 | .01 | .08 | .01 | .10 | −.14+ |
4.W4 Mothers’ Involvement in MX Culture | −.01 | −.43*** | .01 | – | .14+ | −.22** | .50*** | .05 | .01 | .01 |
5.W4 Mothers’ E-R Centrality | .30*** | −.12 | .24** | .09 | – | −.10 | .42*** | −.05 | −.27*** | .16* |
6.W4 Mothers’ E-R Identity Affirmation | .10 | .12 | −.15+ | .00 | .10 | – | −.25** | .06 | .12 | .06 |
7.W5 Mothers’ Cultural Socialization | .21** | −.09 | .02 | .15+ | .33*** | .21** | – | .04 | −.06 | .00 |
8.W6 Children’s Negative E-R Attitudes | .04 | .21** | .23** | −.07 | .03 | −.30*** | .13 | – | .01 | −.01 |
9.W6 Children’s E-R Centrality | .18* | .04 | .31*** | −.15 | .03 | .08 | −.09 | −.03 | – | .21** |
10.W6 Children’s Self-Labeling as MX | −.03 | −.04 | .04 | −.02 | .18* | .04 | .30*** | .07 | .32*** | – |
| ||||||||||
Boys | ||||||||||
Mean | 16.74 | .72 | 3.02 | 3.87 | 3.54 | 3.91 | 3.07 | 1.78 | 2.79 | .59 |
SD | .93 | .45 | .76 | .66 | .63 | .35 | .79 | 1.90 | 1.31 | .49 |
Girls | ||||||||||
Mean | 16.91 | .58 | 3.12 | 3.98 | 3.58 | 3.83 | 2.94 | 1.24 | 2.78 | .62 |
SD | 1.01 | .49 | .87 | .66 | .80 | .36 | .78 | 1.88 | 1.47 | .49 |
Note. E-R = Ethnic-racial. Correlations for boys are above the diagonal; correlations for girls are below the diagonal. Maternal nativity coded: 0 = Foreign-born, 1 = U.S.-born.
p ≤ .08.
p < .05.
p < .01.
p < .001.