Table 2.

Associations Between Maltreatment Class^a and Depression Trajectory, and Depression and BMI Trajectory^b

Independent variable	Females	Males
Model 1	Dependent variable: Depression intercept
No/Low maltreatment	(ref)	(ref)
Supervisory neglect dominant	0.7 (0.3, 1.0)	0.5 (0.2, 0.8)
Physical abuse dominant	1.5 (1.0, 2.0)	1.1 (0.7, 1.6)
High abuse and neglect	2.4 (1.5, 3.2)	1.5 (1.0, 2.0)
	Dependent variable: Depression slope
No/Low maltreatment	(ref)	(ref)
Supervisory neglect dominant	−0.2 (−0.4, 0.1)	−0.0 (−0.3, 0.2)
Physical abuse dominant	0.1 (−0.3, 0.6)	0.1 (−0.2, 0.5)
High abuse and neglect	−0.2 (−1.0, 0.5)	0.0 (−0.5, 0.5)
Model 2	Dependent variable: BMI intercept
Depression intercept	0.1 (−0.0, 0.2)	−0.1 (−0.2, 0.1)
	Dependent variable: BMI slope
Depression intercept	0.1 (−0.0, 0.2)	0.0 (−0.1, 0.1)
Depression slope	1.6 (−2.9, 6.0)	−0.7 (−1.5, 0.2)

Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance (p<0.05).

^aMaltreatment classes derived using latent class analysis (Table 1).

^bNational Longitudinal Study for Adolescent and Adult Health (n=13,362). Associations estimated from gender-stratified, individual latent growth curve models: Model 1 models maltreatment class predicting depression trajectory, Model 2 models depression trajectory predicting BMI trajectory. Adjusted for race/ethnicity, parental education, parental income at Wave I; and time-varying smoking, participant income, and participant education.