Table 5.
Summary of Clinical Outcome
| Author | Clinical Outcome (%*) |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Osterman, 1990 | Failure: 5/42 (11.9) |
|
| |
| Minami et al, 1996 | Minami’s criteria |
| Excellent: 13/16 (81.2) | |
| Fair: 2/16 (12.5) | |
| Poor: 1/16 (6.3) | |
|
| |
| Westkaemper et al, 1998 | MMWS |
| Excellent: 13/28 (46.4) | |
| Good: 8/28 (28.6) | |
| Fair: 2/28 (7.1) | |
| Poor: 5/28 (17.9) | |
|
| |
| Husby et al., 2001 | MMWS |
| Excellent: 13/32 (40.6) | |
| Good: 14/32 (43.8) | |
| Fair: 4/32 (12.5) | |
| Poor: 1/32 (3.1) | |
|
| |
| Blackwell et al., 2001 | MGO criteria |
| Good to Excellent: 19/27 (70.4) | |
| Fair: 6/27 (22.2) | |
| Poor: 2/27 (7.4) | |
|
| |
| Miwa et al., 2004 | Minami’s criteria |
| Excellent: 16/29 (55.2) | |
| Good: 10/29 (34.5) | |
| Fair: 2/29 (6.9) | |
| Poor: 1/29 (3.4) | |
|
| |
| Darlis et al., 2005 | MMWS |
| Excellent: 10/20 (50.0) | |
| Good: 7/20 (35.0) | |
| Fair: 3/20 (15.0) | |
| Poor: 0/20 (0) | |
|
| |
| Infanger et al., 2009 | DASH |
| Very good: 60/79 (75.9) | |
| Good: 19/79 (24.0) | |
| poor: 0/79 (0) | |
|
| |
| Tan et al, 2012 | MMWS |
| Excellent: 12/24 (50.0) | |
| Good: 8/24 (33.3) | |
| Fair: 3/24 (12.5) | |
| Poor: 1/24 (4.2) | |
|
| |
| Mean | Good to Excellent: 222/255 (87) |
| Fair: 22/255 (9) | |
| Poor: 11/255 (4) | |
*
“%” means a percentage of all patients in each study; DASH-the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; MMWS-Mayo Modified Wrist Score