Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Epilepsia. 2017 Nov;58(Suppl 4):10–27. doi: 10.1111/epi.13903

Table 2.

Methodology of EEG recordings: location vs. type of electrode.

Location of recordings Scalp/Epicranial
(Skull intact)
Epidural
(over the dura, dura intact)
Subdural
(Subdural space)
Type of electrodes used Wire-gold-plated/silver/silver-chloride/tin/platinum/stainless steel helix
Contact – C-shaped loops/flat ends
Wire/Stainless steel screws/stainless steel helix
Dos for type of electrode Gold electrodes are better for polysomnography because they accentuate the slower frequencies.
Silver electrodes are better for EEG and epilepsy studies.
Chlorinated silver electrodes record EEGs better than unchlorinated silver electrodes.
Tin conducts more efficiently and is less costly.
Self-tapping screws with blunted tips
Don’ts for type of electrode Mix different metal electrodes for any given recording or use wires with different diameters. Mix different metal electrodes for any given recording or use wires with different diameters.
Pros for location Lower risk of injury to CNS/infection Low impedance/lower contamination with movement artifacts Lower impedance/lower contamination with movement artifacts
Cons for location Higher impedance, movement artifacts, difficulty in associating recording to any specific brain region. Higher risk of injury to CNS/infection/scar tissue formation in chronic recording that increases impedance