Table 1.
CCLE vs GDSC | CCLE vs GDSC | CCLE vs GSK | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IC50 | AUC | IC50 | ||||||
Drug | Cluster | Response | Drug | Cluster | Response | Drug | Cluster | Response |
Erlotinib | ADG | Sensitive | Erlotinib | ADG | Sensitive | Lapatinib | Mixed 1 | Resistant |
AZD6244 | SKCM | Sensitive | AZD6244 | SKCM | Sensitive | Lapatinib | SKCM | Resistant |
AZD6244 | BRCA | Resistant | AZD6244 | BRCA | Resistant | |||
Lapatinib | SCLC | Resistant | Lapatinib | HAL | Resistant | |||
Lapatinib | ADG | Sensitive | Crizotinib | SKCM | Resistant | |||
PD0332991 | GI | Resistant | AZD0530 | SKCM | Resistant | |||
PD0332991 | HAL | Sensitive | PLX4720 | SKCM | Sensitive | |||
PLX4720 | SKCM | Sensitive | ||||||
PD0325901 | GI | Sensitive | ||||||
PD0325901 | SKCM | Sensitive | ||||||
CCLE vs gCSI | GDSC vs gCSI | |||||||
IC50 | IC50 | |||||||
Drug | Cluster | Response | Drug | Cluster | Response | |||
Erlotinib | ADG | Sensitive | PD0325901 | SKCM | Sensitive* | |||
Erlotinib | Mixed 1 | Resistant | ||||||
Erlotinib | GLSR | Resistant | ||||||
Erlotinib | SKCM | Resistant | ||||||
Lapatinib | Mixed 1 | Resistant | ||||||
Lapatinib | ADG | Sensitive | ||||||
PD0325901 | BRCA | Resistant | ||||||
PD0325901 | SKCM | Sensitive | ||||||
CCLE vs gCSI | GDSC vs gCSI | |||||||
Mean Viability | Mean Viability | |||||||
Drug | Cluster | Response | Drug | Cluster | Response | |||
Erlotinib | ADG | Sensitive | PD0325901 | SKCM | Sensitive | |||
Erlotinib | Mixed 1 | Resistant | ||||||
Erlotinib | GLSR | Resistant | ||||||
Erlotinib | SKCM | Resistant | ||||||
Erlotinib | HAL | Resistant | ||||||
Erlotinib | SCLC | Resistant | ||||||
PD0325901 | BRCA | Resistant | ||||||
PD0325901 | SKCM | Sensitive |
In bold associations found significant in at least three datasets. The association between PD0325901 and SKCM had an adjusted p-values of 0.058 (marked with*).