Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 16;118(5):2819–2832. doi: 10.1152/jn.00674.2016

Table 5.

Correlation between self-motion perception asymmetry and values of canal paresis, directional preponderance, slow-phase eye velocity of head shaking test and inclination of subjective visual vertical in UVL patients at different testing time after acute episode

Measure time Correlation R Value P Value
1 wk SMP vs. CP 0.66 P < 0.012
SMP vs. DP 0.71 P < 0.023
SMP vs. HST 0.63 P < 0.031
SMP vs. SVV 0.62 P < 0.036
4 mo SMP vs. CP 0.31 P < 0.014
SMP vs. DP 0.28 P < 0.021
SMP vs. HST 0.33 P < 0.001
SMP vs. SVV 0.15 P = 0.37
8 mo SMP vs. CP 0.21 P < 0.02
SMP vs. DP 0.13 P < 0.043
SMP vs. HST 0.23 P < 0.021
SMP vs. SVV 0.05 P = 0.13
12 mo SMP vs. CP 0.18 P < 0.045
SMP vs. DP 0.11 P < 0.039
SMP vs. HST 0.05 P = 0.12
SMP vs. SVV 0.01 P = 0.27

R and P of regression fitting curve between the variable self-motion perception (SMP), caloric test (CP, canal paresis; DP, directional preponderance), head shaking test (HST), and subjective visual vertical (SVV) at 1 wk and 4, 8, and 12 mo after acute episode of with unilateral vestibular lesions (UVL) in 30 patients.