Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 9;58:45. doi: 10.1186/s40529-017-0199-1

Table 5.

MPSE for three allometric models at different scales developed in the subtropical region of China

Forests Models MPSE (%)
ER1 ER2 ER3 ER4 ER5 ER6 ER7 ER8 Region
CL Model 1 9.51 19.38 20.26 10.06 11.72 20.41 17.92
Model 2 10.83 19.27 21.49 11.71 29.08 21.07 19.44
Model 3 26.04 21.66 23.99 21.99 27.36 24.02 23.01
CMBF Model 1 9.66 26.40 17.89 3.64 22.08 7.75 19.31
Model 2 20.97 26.16 30.69 7.45 25.55 23.19 23.98
Model 3 20.68 28.28 28.79 13.25 31.29 53.38 29.42
DBF Model 1 12.95 21.70 14.00 12.89 14.61 15.73
Model 2 12.53 23.90 40.94 25.35 17.67 22.22
Model 3 18.46 37.84 60.54 29.13 72.78 39.07
EBF Model 1 25.24 13.26 9.82 16.41 5.61 30.40 17.02
Model 2 30.74 17.25 9.87 18.32 5.29 30.65 19.14
Model 3 32.27 29.85 24.61 21.70 11.01 31.03 25.02
ETS Model 1 0.97 18.77 2.79 16.48 17.65 14.38
Model 2 8.20 26.37 5.15 20.46 17.54 16.96
Model 3 29.45 23.77 80.81 39.21 20.15 28.28
PM Model 1 14.45 18.94 15.85 20.86 11.92 15.32 27.19 17.80
Model 2 14.63 19.73 16.05 20.75 19.16 15.39 28.35 18.55
Model 3 15.18 24.97 16.59 23.05 18.40 15.38 33.35 20.49

See Table 1 for the abbreviations of six forests and eight ecoregions