Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 29;10(9):860–866. doi: 10.1111/eva.12498

Table 2.

Multiple reciprocal stigma tests performed between eight different Olive varieties in a diallelic scheme. Each individual was used as pollen donor and pollen recipient in reciprocal crosses (including selfing with itself). Stigma tests were performed and analyzed for compatibility/incompatibility conclusions according to Saumitou‐Laprade et al. (2017). 0: absence of pollen tube or presence of only short pollen tubes never reaching the style interpreted as incompatibility; 1: occurrence of several pollen tubes converging through the stigmatic tissue toward the style until the base of the stigma and entrance of the style interpreted as compatibility between parents. In grey shading results in case of self‐pollination

Variety Name in Orchard Refa [SI]b Pollen donor
Arbequina Dolce Agogia Frantoio Grossane Leccino Maurino Moraiolo Nostrale di Rigali
Oit26 Oit15 Oit25 Oit46 Oit65 Oit17 Oit24 Oit58
G1 G2 G1 G2 G1 G2 G1 G2
Pollen recipient Arbequina Oit26 G1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
Dolce_Agogia Oit15 G2 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
Frantoio Oit25 G1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
Grossane Oit46 G2 0 c 0 0 c 0 0 c 0 0 c 0
Leccino Oit65 G1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
Maurino Oit17 G2 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
Moraiolo Oit24 G1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
Nostrale di Rigali Oit58 G2 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
a

Reference of the tree used for phenotyping: its position in orchard and its genotype with 15 SSR markers are presented in Table S1 (Saumitou‐Laprade et al., 2017).

b

Incompatibility group determined using stigma test and presented in Saumitou‐Laprade et al. (2017).

c

In red, dicrepancy detected between predicted and observed compatibility/incompatibility relationships among varieties.