Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 12;10(9):897–906. doi: 10.1111/eva.12492

Table 2.

Demographic models of different subgroups of An. nili s.l

Population Best model Log‐likelihood Final population sizea (95% CI) Timeb (95% CI)
An. nili group 1 Growth −18.42 6.41 (5.326–20.71) 3.70 (1.11–13.31)
An. nili group 2 Two‐epoch −19.97 17.87 (9.33–35.50) 11.27 (4.93–19.64)
An. ovengensis group 1 Growth −112.18 13.04 (12.15–17.26) 0.70 (0.58–1.08)
An. Ovengensis group 2 Growth −22.98 19.95 (14.45–45.70) 5.11 (2.33–15.13)
a

Relative to ancestral population size.

b

Expressed in units 2Ne generations from start of growth to present.