Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 30;32(12):1921–1930. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.12.1921

Table 5. Adjusted OR of those having a RD for an experience of ED visits within the last one year in Korean adults aged 18 years or over with diabetes based on 2013 KHP data.

Variables Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR 95% CI P values OR 95% CI P values OR 95% CI P values
Age, yr 18–49 1.00 - - 1.00 - - 1.00 - -
50–64 0.57 0.24–1.38 0.214 0.56 0.23–1.37 0.207 0.55 0.27–1.34 0.189
≥ 65 0.84 0.34–2.07 0.697 0.82 0.33–2.03 0.661 0.82 0.33–2.03 0.669
Sex Male 1.00 - - 1.00 - - 1.00 - -
Female 0.59 0.34–1.00 0.049 0.59 0.35–1.00 0.051 0.59 0.35–1.01 0.053
Marital status Married 1.00 - - 1.00 - - 1.00 - -
Divorced/separated/widowed 1.40 0.78–2.49 0.259 1.39 0.78–2.49 0.262 1.39 0.78–2.48 2.270
Unmarried 1.75 0.41–7.55 0.452 1.82 0.42–7.91 0.424 1.76 0.41–7.53 0.444
Education, yr 0–6 1.00 - - 1.00 - - 1.00 - -
7–12 0.69 0.40–1.21 0.196 0.68 0.39–1.20 0.183 0.68 0.39–1.20 0.183
≥ 13 0.18 0.05–0.57 0.004 0.17 0.05–0.56 0.004 0.17 0.05–0.55 0.003
Family income (quintile) (missing = 1) First (the lowest) 1.00 - - 1.00 - - 1.00 - -
Second 1.16 0.59–2.28 0.673 1.16 0.59–2.28 0.674 1.16 0.59–2.28 0.675
Third 1.25 0.58–2.67 0.566 1.25 0.59–2.68 0.560 1.19 0.55–2.55 0.660
Fourth 1.24 0.56–2.76 0.602 1.24 0.59–2.77 0.597 1.21 0.54–2.70 0.639
Fifth (the highest) 1.56 0.66–3.68 0.311 1.59 0.67–3.75 0.293 1.49 0.63–3.53 0.365
Health insurance (missing = 8) Employed 1.00 - - 1.00 - - 1.00 - -
Self-employed 0.91 0.53–1.58 0.740 0.91 0.53–1.58 0.740 0.92 0.53–1.59 0.757
Medical Aid 1.24 0.56–2.76 0.595 1.22 0.55–2.72 0.622 1.27 0.57–2.83 0.554
CCI score* 0 1.00 - - 1.00 - - 1.00 - -
1 1.87 1.04–3.36 0.036 1.87 1.04–3.36 0.036 1.78 0.99–3.20 0.056
≥ 2 2.74 1.41–5.34 0.003 2.74 1.41–5.34 0.003 2.46 1.24–4.86 0.010
Subjective health status (missing = 44) Poor 1.00 - - 1.00 - - 1.00 - -
Moderate 0.72 0.42–1.22 0.22 0.71 0.42–1.21 0.211 0.72 0.42–1.23 0.233
Good 0.65 0.33–1.30 0.227 0.65 0.33–1.30 0.222 0.66 0.33–1.32 0.239
RD Not having 1.00 - - - - - - - -
Having 0.57 0.35–0.94 0.026 - - - - - -
Types of USC Place only as a USC - - - 1.00 - - - - -
Not having a USC - - - 0.84 0.47–1.49 0.545 - - -
RD - - - 0.52 0.29–0.92 0.025 - - -
Types of place where regular physicians work for Not having a regular physician - - - - - - 1.00
Primary care clinic - - - - - - 0.43 0.22–0.81 0.010
Community hospital - - - - - - 0.72 0.30–1.72 0.454
University hospital - - - - - - 0.96 0.40–2.30 0.927
P value for the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test 0.604 0.515 0.147
Concordance statistic for discriminative ability 0.697 0.699 0.701

Multiple logistic regression analysis. Sample cross-sectional weights were applied.

OR = odds ratio, RD = regular doctor, ED = emergency department, KHP = Korea Health Panel, CI = confidence interval, CCI = Charlson comorbidity index, USC = usual source of care.

*It does not contain scores for diabetes, end organ damage by diabetes, moderate or severe liver disease, and thyroid cancer. On a five-point Likert scale, two positive (excellent and good) and two negative (poor and very poor) responses were merged into one positive (good) and one negative (poor) responses. Public community clinic or private community clinic.