Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 31;34(12):808–813. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000691

Table 2.

Quality of evidence for primary outcome categorised by conclusiveness

Characteristic All n = 103 n (%) or median (IQR) Conclusive n = 51 n (%) or median (IQR) Inconclusive n = 52 n (%) or median (IQR)
Number of outcomes assigned a GRADE rating 6 (4, 7) 6 (4, 7) 5 (3, 6)
High-quality evidence for primary outcome 11 (11) 8 (16) 3 (6)
Moderate-quality evidence for primary outcome 35 (34) 23 (45) 12 (23)
Low-quality evidence for primary outcome 42 (40) 17 (33) 25 (48)
Very low-quality evidence for primary outcome 15 (15) 3 (6) 12 (23)
Primary outcome downgraded because of risk of bias 44 (43) 18 (36) 26 (50)
Primary outcome downgraded because of imprecision 36 (35) 11 (22) 25 (48)
Primary outcome downgraded because of inconsistency 18 (18) 8 (16) 10 (19)
Primary outcome downgraded because of publication bias 18 (18) 11 (22) 7 (13)
Primary outcome downgraded because of indirectness 7 (7) 2 (4) 5 (10)

GRADE, Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation.