Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 31;34(12):808–813. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000691

Table 4.

Summary of Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation ratings (n = 103)

Specialty area Intervention category
Anaesthesia Critical care Emergency Medication Medical device Nonpharmacological
Quality of evidence n = 55 n = 42 n = 6 n = 62 n = 30 n = 11
First listed primary outcome High 5 (9) 4 (9) 2 (33) 7 (11) 3 (10) 1 (9)
Moderate 18 (33) 16 (38) 1 (17) 23 (37) 11 (36) 2 (20)
Low 26 (47) 15 (36) 1 (17) 22 (36) 13 (43) 6 (54)
Very low 6 (11) 7 (17) 2 (33) 10 (16) 3 (10) 2 (18)
Secondary outcomea n = 46 n = 39 n = 4 n = 51 n = 29 n = 9
High 6 (13) 10 (26) 0 (0) 7 (14) 8 (27) 1 (11)
Moderate 14 (30) 12 (30) 1 (25) 20 (39) 6 (21) 1 (11)
Low 22 (48) 10 (26) 1 (25) 13 (25) 13 (45) 7 (78)
Very low 4 (9) 7 (18) 2 (50) 11 (22) 2 (7) 0 (0)

Data are given as n (%).

aDenominator is different from primary outcome because not all reviews that used Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation included a secondary outcome.