Table 4.
Specialty area | Intervention category | ||||||
Anaesthesia | Critical care | Emergency | Medication | Medical device | Nonpharmacological | ||
Quality of evidence | n = 55 | n = 42 | n = 6 | n = 62 | n = 30 | n = 11 | |
First listed primary outcome | High | 5 (9) | 4 (9) | 2 (33) | 7 (11) | 3 (10) | 1 (9) |
Moderate | 18 (33) | 16 (38) | 1 (17) | 23 (37) | 11 (36) | 2 (20) | |
Low | 26 (47) | 15 (36) | 1 (17) | 22 (36) | 13 (43) | 6 (54) | |
Very low | 6 (11) | 7 (17) | 2 (33) | 10 (16) | 3 (10) | 2 (18) | |
Secondary outcomea | n = 46 | n = 39 | n = 4 | n = 51 | n = 29 | n = 9 | |
High | 6 (13) | 10 (26) | 0 (0) | 7 (14) | 8 (27) | 1 (11) | |
Moderate | 14 (30) | 12 (30) | 1 (25) | 20 (39) | 6 (21) | 1 (11) | |
Low | 22 (48) | 10 (26) | 1 (25) | 13 (25) | 13 (45) | 7 (78) | |
Very low | 4 (9) | 7 (18) | 2 (50) | 11 (22) | 2 (7) | 0 (0) |
Data are given as n (%).
aDenominator is different from primary outcome because not all reviews that used Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation included a secondary outcome.