Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 31;34(12):808–813. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000691

Table 5.

Reasons for downgrading Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation ratings for primary outcomes

Specialty area Intervention category
Anaesthesia Critical care Emergency Medication Medical device Nonpharmacological
Reasons n = 50 n = 38 n = 6 n = 55 n = 27 n = 10
Risk of bias 23 (46) 18 (47) 3 (50) 23 (42) 14 (52) 7 (70)
Imprecision 16 (32) 17 (45) 3 (50) 17 (31) 14 (52) 5 (50)
Inconsistency 7 (14) 10 (26) 1 (17) 8 (15) 7 (26) 3 (30)
Publication bias 6 (12) 10 (26) 2 (33) 10 (18) 7 (26) 1 (10)
Indirectness 3 (6) 2 (5) 2 (33) 6 (11) 0 (0) 1 (10)

Data are given as n (%).

Columns totals are the number of reviews that used Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation and downgraded the quality of evidence. Frequencies and percentages in each column are not cumulative because a primary outcome could have been downgraded for more than one reason.