Table 3. Outcomes reported by frequency of measurements (Updated to Reflect 2016 Data).

Outcomes reported in >5 studies
Adverse events	Function	Implant Survival	Multidimensional aspects of health
Pain	Patient satisfaction	Range of motion	Shoulder outcome score
Quality of life
Outcomes reported in 2–5 studies
Active external rotation	Activities of daily living	Bony apposition	Component loosening
Decreased component loosening	Decreased radiolucent lines	Device associated adverse events	Disease or joint specific measure
External rotation	External rotation strength	Flexion	Flexion strength
General health component	Glenoid component position	Glenoid erosion	Glenoid status
Integrity & function of subscapular tendon	Internal rotation	Internal rotation strength	Lateralization index
Passive external rotation	Patient objective data	Patient subjective data	Postoperative clinical results
Radiographic evaluation	Radiolucent lines	Revision/reoperation	Scapula abduction strength
Strength	Subacromial space	Subsidence	Test specific outcomes
Tuberosity thinning	X-Rays
Outcomes reported only once
Acromiohumeral interval	Active abduction	Active flexion	Active internal rotation
Active range of motion	Actual versus optimal glenosphere position	Actual versus predicted scapular notching	Anxiety/depression
Biceps rupture	Bone density around the prosthesis	Bony integration of the component	Clinical outcome comparison
Component position	Coracoid to glenohumeral joint distance	Coracoid to tuberosity distance	Correlation between bone density and prosthesis migration
Cost association	Cumulative incidence of migration, radiolucency, osteolysis, and bone wear	Determine if the use of autologous bone graft around the anchor-peg glenoid prosthesis correlate with decreased radiolucent lines and component loosening	Determine if the use of autologous bone graft around the anchor-peg glenoid prosthesis correlate with functional outcomes
Determine if the use of autologous bone graft around the anchor-peg glenoid prosthesis correlate with bony apposition	Device migration	Device success rate	Difference in component migration between conventional and lateralized glenoid components
Effectiveness	Evidence of movement or pending failure	External abduction strength	Fixation to bone/early migration of the implants
Function/disability	Glenoid component migration	Head to tuberosity distance	Health economics
Humeral congruity	Humeral cortical thickness	Humeral stem position-valgus/varus	Humeral subluxation
Impact of arm length difference on patient reported outcome	Internal rotation extension	Intraoperative bleeding	Intraoperative neurovascular injury
Intraoperative prosthetic fracture	Lack of unanticipated device related serious adverse events	Location and placement of HRA device	Mental component summary
Mental health component	Migration between cemented and press-fit RTSA humeral components	Migration of resurfacing prosthesis	Mobility
No evidence of device failure	Osteolysis	Pain at rest	Pain with active motion
Pain/discomfort	Pain/weakness	Passive abduction	Passive flexion
Passive internal rotation	Passive range of motion	Personal dependency status	Physical component summary
Physical function	Postoperative bleeding	Postoperative infection	Postoperative instability
Preoperative pain	Procedure associated adverse events	Qualitative documentation of surgical steps	Radiographic failures
Recovery time	Revision complications	Role emotional	Role physical
Scaption	Scapular notching	Self-care	Social function
Surgical time	Thumb down abduction strength	Time to first revision	Usual activities
Visual analog scale	Vitality	Willingness to have surgery performed again