. 2017 Nov 6;8:2116. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02116

Table 5.

Summary of effects of N and P supply rate, co-infection and individual plant traits on CYDV-RPV and BYDV-PAV titer after model averaging.

Response	Variables^a^,^b	Estimate	Std. Error	AdjustedSE	Z value	Pr(>\|z\|)^c	Relative importance	N Containing models
RPV Titer	(Intercept)	4.542	0.063	0.065	70.426	−2e–16^***	–	–
	Nsupply	−0.001	0.001	0.001	1.291	0.197	0.27	45
	Psupply	−0.002	0.003	0.003	0.727	0.467	0.08	13
	Coinfection	−0.339	0.147	0.151	2.238	0.025^*	0.91	129
	C	−0.188	0.166	0.171	1.103	0.270	0.17	28
	N	−0.637	0.555	0.561	1.136	0.256	0.52	74
	P	−0.063	0.444	0.450	0.140	0.889	0.08	15
	CN	0.202	0.197	0.202	1.003	0.316	0.22	35
	CP	−0.429	0.292	0.298	1.441	0.150	0.26	37
	NP	0.756	0.586	0.596	1.269	0.204	0.29	42
	ABG	0.196	0.223	0.228	0.858	0.391	0.09	15
	AG	0.157	0.277	0.281	0.561	0.575	0.10	19
	BG	−0.152	0.164	0.169	0.902	0.367	0.09	15
	Chlorophyll	−0.026	0.151	0.155	0.166	0.868	0.05	10
	LMA	0.520	0.151	0.155	3.351	0.001^***	1.00	146
	NbDaysEmerg	0.006	0.146	0.150	0.040	0.968	0.04	7
	Senes	−0.205	0.146	0.151	1.360	0.174	0.32	49
PAV Titer	(Intercept)	3.315	0.053	0.054	60.949	<2e-16^***	–	–
	Nsupply	−0.001	0.001	0.001	1.459	0.145	0.33	111
	Psupply	−0.003	0.002	0.002	1.281	0.200	0.30	109
	Coinfection	−0.167	0.146	0.149	1.116	0.265	0.18	67
	C	0.121	0.112	0.115	1.051	0.293	0.15	53
	N	−0.092	0.162	0.165	0.559	0.576	0.06	26
	P	0.001	0.161	0.164	0.005	0.996	0.05	22
	CN	−0.122	0.150	0.153	0.798	0.425	0.10	42
	CP	0.109	0.143	0.146	0.750	0.453	0.08	33
	NP	0.006	0.119	0.122	0.051	0.959	0.04	16
	ABG	0.065	0.222	0.225	0.290	0.772	0.17	65
	AG	0.397	0.283	0.286	1.388	0.165	0.62	215
	BG	−0.262	0.204	0.208	1.258	0.209	0.30	105
	Chlorophyll	−0.167	0.148	0.151	1.103	0.270	0.18	68
	LMA	0.159	0.113	0.115	1.378	0.168	0.38	138
	NbDaysEmerg	0.213	0.141	0.144	1.483	0.138	0.37	124
	Senes	0.003	0.135	0.18	0.021	0.983	0.04	19

All variables were standardized prior to analysis. Variables of highest relative importance are highlighted in bold.

Because leaf water content was calculated based on fresh mass per area and LMA, the variable water content was removed from this analysis to avoid inherent correlations in explanatory variables.

Significance of effects is indicated according to a 0.05

^(*)

, 0.01

(**), and 0.001

^(***)

threshold.