Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 10;7:15294. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14813-y

Table 2.

Univariate analysis of different prognostic variables in DSS and RFS of CL-HCC patients using the by Cox proportional hazard model Abbreviations: 95% CI = 95% confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; TNM stage = tumour node metastasis; P-value < 0.05.

Variables DSS RFS
HR 95%CI P value HR 95%CI P value
Sex
male/female 1.038 0.406–2.652 0.938 0.994 0.387–2.557 0.990
Age(years)
≤50/>50 0.662 0.339–1.292 0.227 0.689 0.358–1.362 0.292
AFP(ng/ml)
≤20/>20 1.526 0.279–2.990 0.047 0.528 0.279–1.001 0.050
HBsAg
yes/no 0.761 0.252–2.297 0.628 0.737 0.243–2.234 0.059
Tumor size(cm)
≤5/>5 1.475 0.543–1.927 0.029 3.415 1.214–3.805 0.009
Multiplicity
Single/multiple 0.755 0.364–1.565 0.45 0.717 0.343–1.499 0.377
Intrahepatic Metastasis
yes/no 2.191 0.943–3.854 0.03 1.212 0.748–1.942 0.041
TNM stage
(I/II)/(III/VI) 2.857 1.084–7.531 0.034 3.380 1.269–9.003 0.015
Vascular Invasion
yes/no 2.481 1.099–5.602 0.029 2.323 1.002–5.383 0.049
Tumor Differentiation
Poor/well 1.753 0.910–2.356 0.031 1.203 1.215–1.781 0.019
PKM2 expression
low/high 2.240 1.091–4.597 0.028 2.537 1.106–4.965 0.028