Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 10;7:15294. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14813-y

Table 5.

Multivariate analysis of different prognostic variables in DSS and RFS of NCL-HCC patients using the Cox proportional hazard model.

Variables DSS RFS
HR 95%CI P value HR 95%CI P value
Model 1
AFP(ng/ml)
≤20/>20 0.817 0.311–2.148 0.682 0.851 0.323–2.236 0.743
HBsAg
yes/no 0.956 0.127–7.221 0.966 0.961 0.127–7.529 0.970
Model 2
AFP(ng/ml)
≤20/>20 0.875 0.331–2.313 0.788 0.935 0.354–2.471 0.892
HBsAg
yes/no 0.634 0.080–4.994 0.665 0.638 0.081–5.025 0.669
PKM2 expression
low/high 3.960 1.464–10.712 0.007 3.812 1.417–10.254 0.008
Model 3
AFP(ng/ml)
≤20/>20 0.627 0.217–1.815 0.390 0.862 0.298–2.494 0.784
HBsAg
yes/no 0.247 0.025–2.422 0.230 0.306 0.032–2.932 0.304
Tumor size (cm)
≤5/>5 3.734 1.160–12.020 0.027 2.904 0.899–4.381 0.045
Intrahepatic Metastasis
yes/no 5.832 1.980–17.095 0.011 5.354 1.810–10.261 0.012
TNM stage
(I/II)/(III/VI) 1.260 0.487–1.776 0.016 2.276 1.093–3.818 0.020
Vascular Invasion
yes/no 1.108 0.217–1.676 0.017 1.312 1.021–3.819 0.030
Tumor Differentiation
Poor/well 2.387 1.302–2.406 0.033 1.891 1.520–3.845 0.028
PKM2 expression
low/high 4.857 1.534–15.375 0.007 3.996 1.314–12.154 0.015

Abbreviations: 95% CI = 95% confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; TNM stage = tumour node metastasis; P-value < 0.05.